A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

I'd never seen this before



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old January 1st 08, 10:25 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bertie the Bunyip
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 316
Default I'd never seen this before

On 1 Jan, 22:15, Mxsmanic wrote:
Ron Wanttaja writes:
No. *Pilots are accustomed to judging the altitude of other aircraft based on
whether it's above or below the horizon. *This is great for collision avoidance,
but doesn't work at longer ranges. *ANYTHING located at the viewer's horizon
will appear above the altitude of the observer, and it *is* due to the curvature
of the Earth. *See:


http://www.wanttaja.com/los.jpg


Normally, though, details at such distances are obscured by haze.


But the original post made no mention of the horizon.

On a flat surface of infinite extent, the horizon is always at eye level, no
matter what your position. *On a flat surface of finite extent, it is always
slightly below eye level, depending on how far away the edge of the surface
is. *On a spherical planet, the horizon is still lower; to find its distance
(assuming smooth terrain), add your altitude to the radius of the planet,
square it, subtract the radius of the planet squared, and take the square root
of the result. *At an altitude of 3000 feet above smooth terrain (such as
water, or a dry lake), the horizon on Earth is 58 nm away. *If you are six
feet tall and standing on the surface with smooth terrain (or if you are in a
rowboat on a calm ocean, for example), the horizon is just 2.6 nm distant.

Your diagram is interesting, but since it dramatically overstates the height
of towers and dramatically understates the size of the planet, it's a bit
misleading. *Your towers would be several times higher than the orbit of the
International Space Station, and the aircraft would be in outer space.

On a flat surface, anything moving down in your field of view is something
you'll fly over, and anything moving up is something you'll hit. *The
curvature of the Earth complicates this, but the curvature is gentle enough
that anything affected by it is too far away to be an immediate hazard,
anyway. *At 3000' AGL, you could see Mount Everest from 239 nm away, but since
a small plane might take two hours reach it, you'd have plenty of time to
evaluate it as a hazard.

Thought experiments like this can be interesting. *People often say that the
Concorde was wonderful because you could see the curvature of the Earth, but
the fact is that you can see the curvature from anywhere, even a hill
overlooking the beach. *It just gets more obvious as you move further away
from the surface. *From an airliner at 39,000 feet, the view extends for well
over 210 miles in every direction. *I was once amused to discover on a flight
from Phoenix to Los Angeles that I could see both cities from my window at the
same time at the midpoint of the flight.



the only curavture you've ever seen is that of your butt as you
inserted your head all those years ago.

Bertie
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.