![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cub Driver schrieb:
Since when is a genocide a "uniquely European problem"? It happened in Europe, but it could have happened anywhere else. Since when has Europe been worried about genocide? Since we have learned from WW2. Since it is common ground to tread genocide as an international crime ("...against humanity"). Do you discern on this position? We (those you mentioned) try to face our history and approach pardon and respect.. other nations still neglect their record. Nations who are members of "the coalition". You worried about Serbia only because it threatened European interests. In which aspect? The civil war blocked the land route to the EU member Greece and the closed Danube, but what else besides threatened morale and justice? Involving surrounding countries in the civil war? I am not worried about Serbia, I am worried about the radical nationalists of any given group in the Balkans, no matter if they rant for "Great Serbia", "Great Albania" or whatever.. the UCK isnīt any better then the bosnian serbs and the mercenaries who fought along them. The moment we pull out of Bosnia, Sarajevo will be back to the times of sniper alley and bloodbaths on market places. Do you (demanding "PULL OUT THE US FORCES!") really want that? Saddam killed more Muslims than Slobo did. Why wasn't that genocide? Who says it wasnīt? If you consider the actions against Kurds, thats genocide. And it is a shame that our society (you, us, everyone dealing with that dicator in the 1980s) accepted it without taking direct initiative. His absolute numbers ("more Muslims") probably result of the Gulf War I... a war fought in times when Saddam Hussein shook hands with Rumsfeld, when the Iraq was used as a glancing example of stability and development in the middle east. Killing Persians was obviously appropriate at that time. Arafat is waging genocidal war against the Jews (picking up where Europe left off). Why haven't you intervened in the Middle East against him? Why havenīt the USA? And do recall what country provided the great weight of men and weapons to fight in the Balkans. (Hint: it wasn't France, the rare European country that actually has a military worth respecting.) This is about those who demand "Pull out of the Balkans" - you donīt start a war with Iraq when you havenīt finished another job (stabilising the Balkans or Afghanistan - that country isnīt done yet, as the only "secured area" is Kabul and the absolute proximities of the capital). all the best -- Dan Ford email: www.danford.net/letters.htm#9 Gruss, Roman |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flying to Europe | Bob Webster | Instrument Flight Rules | 19 | April 26th 04 04:08 PM |
Fractional Ownership in Europe N-reg airplne | EDR | Aviation Marketplace | 2 | December 12th 03 09:42 AM |
USA armed URSS to keep down Europe | IO | Military Aviation | 9 | October 21st 03 07:19 AM |
American joke on the Brits | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 50 | September 30th 03 10:52 PM |
Airmen in Europe may go back to three-month rotation schedules | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | August 22nd 03 11:47 PM |