![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 5, 4:08*pm, William Hung wrote:
On Jan 5, 3:59*pm, "Morgans" wrote: "William Hung" wrote Not that what I think matters, but I think that the 150/2s are great looking, even better looking than the 172s. *Doesn't the 150/2s qualify for LSA status? *I would sonner buy them over the new one and just use the balance to fully pimp it out(zero time engine, new prop, new interior and paintjob, new toys for the panel...etc.), but that's just me. Nope. *Too heavy. That was one of my major complaints about the new (was new) LSA rule. *IMO, the rule should have had a high enough weight limit that the 152 was light enough to qualify. -- Jim in NC Shame that. *I really like the C150/2s. *I'll still try to save up for one anyways. Wil- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Oh yeah, if I can get a hanger space or a tiedown nearby. Wil |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Skycatcher IFR? | Matt Whiting | Owning | 57 | November 26th 07 11:59 PM |
Cessna's new LSA: "Skycatcher" | Jim Logajan | Piloting | 107 | September 23rd 07 01:18 AM |
Cessna's new LSA: "Skycatcher" | Jim Logajan | Owning | 110 | September 23rd 07 01:18 AM |
Cessna's new LSA: "Skycatcher" | miffich | Piloting | 1 | July 24th 07 12:04 AM |
how to cope with negative g´s? | Markus | Aerobatics | 6 | July 2nd 05 12:00 AM |