"socialist" when describing Hillary Clinton

Matt Whiting wrote in news:stggj.1382$2n4.31374
@news1.epix.net:

Thomas Borchert wrote:
Bob,

Denying the theory of evolution is not necessarily anti-science.

I can't see how it isn't.

If the theory is incorrect, then denying it is not anti-science at all.


Yes, it is.




Are people going to demand some kind litmus test for embracing
science of Presidential candidates? Can we apply that to voters
too?


It would certainly make sense (in both cases ;-)). Everything happening
around us is based in science. A thorough understanding of the
scientific process is pretty much mandatory for making decisions, at
least if they're supposed to be good ones.

No argument here. The trouble is that much of today's science is based
on some very false assumptions made by Darwin and others.


Prove it.


Bertie