![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 8, 8:15 pm, "noel.wade" wrote:
OK, how's this for a switcheroo (hijacking my own thread!) - A couple of people here stated that they thought I wouldn't see much of a performance difference by going to a flapped ship in weak conditions. A couple of local pilots with decades of experience have now also said that. There's still a mental appeal to me in having a "complex" glider - but if it'll get me a newer or nicer aircraft, I'm open to the idea of a Standard-Class ship instead. I've had a private email from someone suggesting an SZD-55 as a good option (though I don't know if they'd be within my $30k budget limit). Any other thoughts on what I could get in the Standard class for around $25k - $30k? Priorities are still 38:1 minimum L/D, good weak- weather performance (low sink-rate and/or great climb rate), maneuverable/responsive in the air, and relatively easy to rig. Honestly I haven't looked all that much... I'm not interested in old beasts like the LS-1s or G102s or Standard Cirruses. A Libelle H-201, eh (would probably go with a 301 at that point). How's the Pegasus in light conditions? Any other weak-weather performers that folks would recommend in the Standard Class? Thanks a bunch for all the thoughts and advice! --Noel Hi Noel, I live in Minnesota, not really known for its strong conditions. I considered many of the sailplanes you did for my first ship and flew to both coasts to look at a few of them. For example, I looked at a Mosquito and an LS-1f. I ended up buying a Jantar Standard 2 simply because it was by far in the best shape of the lot. At 6 foot and 200 pounds you will fit fine in it. It is easy to rig and the connections are easy to manipulate and verify. Airbrakes and water hook up automatically. There is a single pin to align with a rigging tool to pull the wings in. Wings are on the heavier side, but fit ladies can manage the wingtips no problem. I typically rig faster than others. Like you, I worried a lot about weak-weather performance, especially after I read the numbers in the sailplane directory. It turned out to be a complete non-issue. Perhaps because the numbers are wrong! They list a sink rate of 0.77 m/s or 151 ft/min at 52 kts. However this sink rate is for the fully-ballasted condition with 150 liters of water (10 pounds/ft**2 loading) The actual dry figures from the POH are 0.60 m/s or 118 ft/min at 41 kts and 6.2 pounds/ft**2 loading. Real world experience? I did my 50k (100k+ actually) on a day when a well-piloted Ka-6E and another higher performing flapped ship landed out. So it can't be that bad 'cause I am not that good! Regarding glide, during my five hour, I flew for a long time with a Mosquito. At best glide it was pretty even with the edge going to the Mosquito. It is tough as nails and parts are available too. Most are poly- urethaned. Anyway, hope this helps in your search. I'd go for the nicest condition ship I could find. /Adam |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Glider Model - Blaue Maus- 1922 Wasserkuppe Glider | [email protected] | Soaring | 5 | November 19th 06 11:08 PM |
shipping glider to NZ-advice on securing glider in trailer | November Bravo | Soaring | 6 | November 1st 06 02:05 PM |
Schweizer 1-35 and other flapped sailplanes | Jack | Soaring | 39 | August 22nd 05 08:57 PM |
CHT recommendations | Dude | Owning | 3 | December 26th 04 05:07 PM |
MFD recommendations | Richard Kaplan | Products | 13 | January 27th 04 04:04 PM |