![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 9, 9:12 am, Andreas Maurer wrote:
an advice: Don't stick too close to numbers. Performance numbers of glider differ vastly depending on who measured them (Johnson or the German Idaflieg), and, more important: Sheer performance numbers are only one part of the truth. In reality you are not going to notice if your ship has two points better L/D or a slightly better sink rate. Bye Andreas I totally agree with you on the numbers deal - especially when it comes to manufacturer's specs! And I know that small variances in finishing and mold changes over the years can affect the L/D by a point or two. But at least with Johnson (and other practical flight tests) I have demonstrated numbers that have actually been measured *in flight* - not theoretical or predicted numbers. And I understand that I won't notice one or two points of L/D - that's why I'm going for a jump from ~31:1 to at least 38:1. That big of a spread I _will_ notice. The reason I use sink-rate as a measure of performance is because it directly affects climb rate in a thermal, and just trying to figure out which airplane "thermals best" is subjective, dependant upon conditions, and plain tough to get an accurate reading on (especially because so few people have flown a wide range of gliders over the years - so there's little common basis for direct comparison). Dave - The 1f is cool; but the two that I've found talk about having rough finishes. A glider that old/cheap is just not worth the cost to refinishing... Again, its not that I don't like them; but do you think that an $18k LS-1f is a better purchase than a good-condition LS-3 at $24k? The difference in monthly loan cost is not an issue for me (I'm not rich, but I've carefully budgetted to handle $8k to $10k down and a $15k to $18k loan). Having only flown my Russia, Blanik L-13s, and SGS 2-33s I think I ought to follow through with my original plan to visit Minden sometime soon and try their Mini, LS-3a, and LS-4. I need some seat-time in 15m ships to see how they compare to my Russia... Thanks again, all! The conversation is certainly good for helping organize my thoughts and refine my opinions. Anyone have any info about SZD-55's? I had two people email me privately to say that they thought I could pick one up for around my $30k limit - but those folks were in England and I haven't heard anyone from the USA talk about this model. It got plenty of favorable reviews when it came out... ?? Take care, --Noel |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Glider Model - Blaue Maus- 1922 Wasserkuppe Glider | [email protected] | Soaring | 5 | November 19th 06 11:08 PM |
shipping glider to NZ-advice on securing glider in trailer | November Bravo | Soaring | 6 | November 1st 06 02:05 PM |
Schweizer 1-35 and other flapped sailplanes | Jack | Soaring | 39 | August 22nd 05 08:57 PM |
CHT recommendations | Dude | Owning | 3 | December 26th 04 05:07 PM |
MFD recommendations | Richard Kaplan | Products | 13 | January 27th 04 04:04 PM |