![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 10, 2:04*pm, Peter Clark
wrote: For part 91 ops, you only need to have the required inflight visibility. Don't you have to have ceiling and visibility, or at least the laundry list from 91.175(c)(3)(i) to proceed to 100' ATDZE? *I'm thinking airport in a valley with fog yet you're at the DH and still above the layer. Pete, In the USA ceiling is not a requirement. I dont do part 91 IFR stuff very often, but as I recall you can still go down and have a look no mater what the WX is reporting. Frank |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CAT IIIC minimums | Andrey Serbinenko | Instrument Flight Rules | 26 | August 7th 06 08:56 PM |
First approach to minimums | Steven Barnes | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | October 21st 05 07:47 PM |
descent below minimums | hsm | Instrument Flight Rules | 82 | January 11th 05 06:33 PM |
Personal VFR Minimums | Neil Bratney | Piloting | 6 | September 2nd 04 08:32 AM |
CAT II Minimums on a CAT I Approach | Giwi | Instrument Flight Rules | 11 | July 24th 03 07:46 AM |