![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ernest Christley wrote:
cavalamb himself wrote: Almost ALL experimental Amateur built airplanes would qualify as open source... Truer words have never been spoken. I don't know what sockpuppet61 has against enthusiast checking over and correcting each other's work, improving it and sharing their improvements, but he obviously hasn't a clue what can be accomplished in this way. I'm a full-time, won't-touch-Windows-any-more, Linux man. I use it for both work and play, and it's performance is stellar. The point is that if something goes wrong, I can (and have) go into the source code and fix it. Now, socketpuppet61 may not be able to, because he probably isn't a software engineer, but the fact is that it can be done. I would trust open-source that I could audit long before closed-source. As a matter of fact, I'm doing exactly that. My engine controller will be a Megasquirt unit that comes as a kit with open source software. It was designed for cars, so I will be modifying it to make it more appropriate for airplane use (mostly just making it simpler). Amateur built airplanes are the same way. You have the plans. You can change anything you like. The whole RV line began, because VanGrueson had an airplane that he liked...except for a few handling issues. Can't remember the name of the predecessor, and I think I mangled Van's name, but he had the education, training, skill AND opportunity to fix what he thought were the problems. The result is the all-time most successful line of kit built airplanes. As Ron mentioned, the problem with having people sit down and draw up a design is that you don't know who's qualified and the end result won't be seen for years. (With software, the end result can be produced in minutes.) We do have open-source, though, in that you can cruise down the homebuilt line at the fly-ins and take pictures of what you consider good ideas. Talk to the builders and get their opinion of how their modifications worked out. Maybe click through their web logs to see what they're doing, and how they're doing it. You'll still need to get a set of plans for the overall design, but you'll never be limited to JUST what is in that one set of plans. Ernest, If I could find a comfortable CAD program for Linux, I'd join ya. Richard |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Long EZ plans, Mini IMP plans, F4U Corsair plans, materials, instruments for sale | reader | Home Built | 1 | January 26th 11 01:40 AM |
Open-source flight/space simuators for Linux | Timothy Stark | Simulators | 0 | July 8th 07 03:37 AM |
Duster Plans For Sale - BJ-1b fullsize sailplane plans | WoodHawk | Soaring | 0 | April 25th 05 04:37 AM |
want to trade 601 plans for 701 plans | [email protected] | Home Built | 0 | January 27th 05 07:50 PM |
Free aircraft plans? | Gil G. | Home Built | 0 | July 23rd 03 04:18 PM |