![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Rich S." wrote Isn't that about like a DC-3? Now *there's* a failure as a design! ![]() Is that so? Fuel load for around 4 hours of flight, and only one pilot on board, and it can only do 400 FPM at 3000 feet? Dunno. I would have thought it better than that. Nowdays, I would think that is still pretty poor for a brand-new designed twin. Anyone else have an opinion on the subject? -- Jim in NC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Twin engine prop rotation? | Chris Wells | General Aviation | 12 | December 19th 07 08:52 PM |
FAA To Change Twin-Engine Airliner Regulations | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 6 | June 13th 06 12:30 AM |
Twin Engine Cessna 172 crashs :) | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 3 | August 19th 04 04:17 PM |
Twin Engine Cessna 172 crashs :) | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 2 | August 19th 04 01:13 PM |
pressurized twin-engine, 16 to 19 seats buy | Federico Prüssmann | Owning | 0 | September 25th 03 06:44 PM |