![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "jan olieslagers" wrote Opinions are plenty, and cheap... But you asked, so here goes: The single-engine rate-of-climb seems little relevant to me. I always understood if one engine quits, the mission is to come down safely, not to go up. One of the biggest reasons that some people choose to pay for buying and running an extra engine is so that they do not have to come down, in places like over cold, killing water, and hard granite mountains at night. So that means it can perhaps do one mission, partway. It should be able to stay up over the ocean, with only a light load, perhaps. Rule out higher large bodies of water. For sure, rule out mountains in the night, and with a full load, hills in the night, too. Why bother with a twin, (paying for an extra engine, and its maintenance, and feeding) if you have to crash in those types of bad places, just like a single? Shoot, even worse, with two engines, you double the odds that one will fail! -- Jim in NC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Twin engine prop rotation? | Chris Wells | General Aviation | 12 | December 19th 07 08:52 PM |
FAA To Change Twin-Engine Airliner Regulations | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 6 | June 13th 06 12:30 AM |
Twin Engine Cessna 172 crashs :) | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 3 | August 19th 04 04:17 PM |
Twin Engine Cessna 172 crashs :) | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 2 | August 19th 04 01:13 PM |
pressurized twin-engine, 16 to 19 seats buy | Federico Prüssmann | Owning | 0 | September 25th 03 06:44 PM |