A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

VWs



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old January 29th 08, 03:40 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 373
Default VWs

I had posted a link to a vid of a 701 weaving through the trees over
on .piloting.

At some point down the line I expressed interest in a VW powered 701.

One guy said he figured a VW would melt down in an aircraft cowling
when producing no more that 50HP.

He provided a link to Bob Hoover's blog, which had an entry "The
Christmas Engine", in which he states pretty flatly that:

1) No way to get 80 (let alone 100) HP out of an aircooled VW for any
extended period of time.
2) No way to cool an engine at those HP values if you could get them,
so you either get meltdown or very low time between overhauls.

Bob's blog looks as though he's talking direct drive. That pretty much
lines up with what I've read on the Great Plains website. GP says you
can only get higher HP from the VW by PSRU. That I can believe, on the
general principle that any engine has higher HP at higher RPM. Since
the VW wasn't designed to spin propellers, well, the best HP values vs
RPM don't align nicely for a direct drive VW and a propeller, do they?
That stands to reason.

So I'm asking this: for you VW people builders, what about cooling,
and is there some dyno data available from VWs spinning props with
PSRUs and direct drive available? Something somebody has been willing
to publish?

What about meltdowns? Because if what Bob Hoover says is true then it
seems to me there's no way Great Plains should be making a living --
unless their customers never have checked the numbers they GP claims.
GP has a lot of customers. You'd think they'd be screaming bloody
murder if they couldn't at least get close to 80 for takeoff.

I'm more concerned with thrust and cooling, though, than some HP
number.

What gives? What's "the truth"?
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.