A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

VW Reality



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #23  
Old February 6th 08, 04:38 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Bill Daniels
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 687
Default VW Reality


wrote in message
...
On Feb 5, 8:07 pm, "Bill Daniels" bildan@comcast-dot-net wrote:
Way back when I was a university student I got stuck fixing a girlfriends
VW
"Bug". (I think she liked the Bug more than me but kept me around 'cause I
could fix it.) From that experience I developed a strong dislike for the
"Bug". My Volvo 544 was both more comfortable and more reliable while
providing about the same gas milage.

Once while chasing VW parts in the Volvo (Never happened the other way
'round) I struck up a conversation with a German mechanic at a VW shop.
Refering to the little flat 4, he said, "Well, it was a good idea when it
made 36HP - not so good when they increased the power. "What do you
drive?", I asked. He pointed to a brand new Caddy and gave me a slow wink.

If you want a light weight engine why not look hard at state of the art
Japanese "liter bike" engines instead of a 60 year old VW design? My
Kawasaki cranks out 108HP and is reputed to be bulletproof. Of course a
PRSU would be manditory given that the little Kawi would be turning almost
9,000 RPM.

Somebody made a 2.8 liter V8 out of a pair of Hyabusa cylinder blocks.
Making a flat 4 shouldn't be any harder.
See:http://thekneeslider.com/archives/20...usa-v8-engine/


some in Deutschland have built aero conversions out of BMW R series
engines.

most of the HP from those japanese engines comes at very high rpm --
have to develop a very solid PSRU for that ... and there's nobody
flying these things, which means you'd be a real guinea pig. But, I
say if you've really thought it through, and done a lot of testing,
bike engine might turn out to work (but only with a really bullet
proof PSRU)

Well, I'm not going to build a Hyabusa flat 8 but if I were, I'd be thinking
about a planetary gear PSRU. Planetarys have a lot of gear tooth engagement
and are happy with high RPM sun gears. A fairly small planetary can get 4:1
reduction which would reduce 9000RPM to a very usable 2250.

The propeller thrust bearings would be on the ring gear - the engine
crankshaft would see only torque loads. This little screamer would produce
about 280HP in stock trim from an engine about the size of an O-200.

Bill D


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
HondaJet a reality [email protected] Piloting 3 July 28th 06 01:50 AM
Pilot deviations and a new FAA reality Chip Jones Piloting 125 October 15th 04 07:42 PM
Pilot deviations and a new FAA reality Chip Jones Instrument Flight Rules 36 October 14th 04 06:10 PM
Reality of Tie Down (Tiedown) Space at SNA Tie Town Owning 1 May 6th 04 07:43 AM
Reality of Tie Down (Tiedown) Space at SNA Tie Town Piloting 1 May 6th 04 07:43 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.