A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Boeing Awarded Contract For Next-Generation Harpoon Block III Missile



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old February 6th 08, 07:08 PM posted to sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military.naval
Fred J. McCall
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 107
Default Boeing Awarded Contract For Next-Generation Harpoon Block III Missile

Clark wrote:

:Fred J. McCall wrote in
:
:
: Clark wrote:
:
::Fred J. McCall wrote in
:
::
:: "Dean A. Markley" wrote:
::[snip]
:::
:::A quick search reveals the following:
:::
::
:: Should have searched a bit slower. Let me correct:
::
::
::Why do you claim authority?
::
:
: Because I can read and you apparently cannot.
:
:In other words you are a parrot with no authority. Start backing up your
:claims or drop your 'tude to a sociable level.
:

In other words, I can read and go with the facts and you cannot. Feel
free to go sod yourself.

:
:
::
::
:::
:::Harpoon weight of 1145 lbs Max Speed = 530mph
:::
::
:: That's the weight for the air-launch Harpoon. If you launch it from a
:: ship it weighs almost 1500 pounds.
:
:Yup and that weight drops back to the 1145 as soon as the booster drops
ff. Now why didn't you note that Freddy? Hmmmm. You failed to note that
:because it detracts from your arguement, doesn't Freddy.
:

I don't have an "argument", you stupid git. I'm just correcting his
facts.

And the weight of both of them changes as they burn fuel. So what?

:
:
::
::
:::
:::SM2 weight of 2980 lbs(don't know if this includes booster) Max Speed =
:::1900mph
:::
::
:: That's the weight for the ER version. It's over 26 feet long and I
:: don't believe we currently have any ships that fire it. The MR
:: version of SM-2 weighs around 1400 pounds.
::
::Just what system is the Navy using for ABM? They are in service even if
:it
::is a small number of ships...
::
:
: SM-3. It's a very different configuration with different guidance and
: a different warhead.
:
:
:SM-3 is a derivative of SM-2 ER Block IV. For the purposes of this argument
:it is SM-3 because the you're arguing weight.
:

Do you know for a fact that a VLS cell that will handle SM-3
(essentially a 4 stage missile of much greater weight and height) will
handle an SM-2ER? I don't.

Do you know for a fact that SM-3 with a LEAP warhead even *has* a
secondary anti-ship mode? I don't. Again, the guidance is *VERY*
different.

:
:
::
::
:: Oh, and that 1900 MPH is at altitude. It's going to be slower down in
:: denser air.
::
::
::??? What trajectory does the SM use? Is it a sea skimmer in the surface
::attack mode?
::
:
: You think enemy ships are at 30,000 feet? I'd find that pretty
: surprising, personally.
:
:
:Look up the word trajectory. Try to understand that there are several paths
:between two points. Now try to think about my question and then smack
:yourself in the forehead when you realize how absolutely stupid your
:comment is. Now hit yourself in the forehead again so you remember not to
:leap to an idiotic conclusion next time.
:

Look up the guidance for SM-2, you stupid clod.

:
:Since you still haven't figured it out, I neve said the SM would stay at
:any particular altitude. Now try to remember the concepts of potential
:energy and kinetic energy. Try real hard. Get some help if you can't figure
ut why an arcing trajectory is desirable for some points of view.
:

It certainly makes you easier to shoot down. It also screws up
guidance for this particular missile.

:
:
::
::
:::
:::Now the Harpoon carries a much larger warhead but the SM2 is heavier and
:::impacts at a much higher speed. Is it reasonable to make a SWAG that a
:::Standard SM2 will inflict as much or more damage?
:::
:::After all, speed kills....
:::
::
:: By the time they reach the target, Harpoon is probably heavier
:: (because of the heavier warhead). A lot of that weight in the
:: Standard round is fuel.
::
:: Speed isn't what kills. That's why we put warheads on the things.
::
::
::Speed kills. Blast kills. How much energy is delivered to the target? That
::question is all that matters.
::
:
: And much more is generally delivered by something going 'boom' than by
: something that doesn't.
:
: Go run the numbers for yourself...
:
:
on't tell me what to do punk. You really should allow room for the world
:to change Freddy. It is going to change whether you like it or not.
:

Fine, don't run them. You've just shown you're merely a loudmouth
idiot incapable of supporting your own position.


--
"Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less remote from the
truth who believes nothing than he who believes what is wrong."
-- Thomas Jefferson
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AeroVironment Awarded Contract for Development of Global Observer Stratospheric Unmanned Aircraft System Larry Dighera Piloting 4 May 21st 09 01:57 AM
ITT awarded ADS-B contract Doug Vetter Piloting 7 August 31st 07 07:32 PM
Boeing $241.8 million contract ballistic missile-hunting Airborne Laser Larry Dighera Military Aviation 1 May 29th 04 12:05 PM
Next Generation Aircraft Carrier Contract Awarded Otis Willie Naval Aviation 6 May 23rd 04 02:53 PM
The U.S. Air Force awarded BOEING CO. a $188.3 million new small-diameter precision-guided bomb contract Larry Dighera Military Aviation 3 October 28th 03 12:07 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.