![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 10, 6:27*am, wrote:
I've never heard any mention of a design from the Brits. Actually, the design concept was quite simple. They did the entire aircraft based on ballistic tests with a 50 Cal. bullet even to taking the canopy out of the equation and replacing it with molded in windows. ... The horizontal tail proved to be the only real issue and they changed that to a slab tail to solve the shock issue. -- Dudley Henriques I watched one of the Nova series episodes about 3 weeks ago about breaking the sound barrier (I rented it on DVD). They covered the British and American attempts to break the barrier in fair detail, and had extensive interviews with one of the engineers from Miles Aircraft, the British firm that was asked by the RAF to develop a supersonic aircraft. IIRC, the Miles' engineer said that they concluded that the best fuselage design would be one modeled after a bullet. He also said they figured a hydraulic actuated movable tail would do the trick to stop the shock-wave induced control freeze up that was killing so many pilots during the time. It was said that an American team did go to England during the last part of the war and met with the Miles' engineering group, and that the Miles' group was going to go to the US afterward to see what the American's had learned, but the Pentagon nixed their trip. The Brits didn't like that one. Anyway I can't remember the timelines here ... a few weeks before Miles' was to begin actual prototype testing of their ship (which looked very much like the X1, but with a different nose) their program was cancelled. This was sometime shortly after VE day. It was cancelled by a bureaucrat who had visited some of the secret German aircraft development centers the Allieds had discovered (some buried underground). There he had seen swept wing designs and somehow concluded that sweptwing was the only way to go supersonic. He cancelled the supersonic program because the Miles' design was a straight wing. Ah. Thanks for that, part of the story is in Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miles_M.52 The time lines show that the data given to Bell in 1944 was key to their development (the Brits had been working on the control problem for years and a picture of an air tunnel model is in the wiki ref). Bell started their program in 1945. If the British had not scrapped it for political/financial reasons in 1946,I don't doubt it would have been the first true supersonic airplane. The m.52 design was apparently so good that it did not break up as planned in a destructive test on an unpiloted model at 15g! It is a shame that Bell did not live up to the trans-atlantic technology agreements in place at that time. Yet another example of the shortsightedness of the British government in not trusting in the abilities of their engineers and investing in technology. A history repeated with the TSR2: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TSR2 Cheers |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New and Used Airplanes | [email protected] | Products | 0 | May 29th 07 05:02 PM |
How many GA airplanes... | john smith | Piloting | 2 | May 10th 06 05:19 PM |
Q On NYC Airplanes | John A. Weeks III | General Aviation | 3 | March 16th 06 12:35 PM |
AIRPLANES! | W P Dixon | Home Built | 10 | October 7th 04 11:28 AM |
E-bay airplanes | Paul Folbrecht | Owning | 11 | March 4th 04 12:00 AM |