![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter,
It really doesn't matter WHERE in the lineup the longest belt is. You can have two, or "very many", and absolutely none of them will be the exact same length. One WILL be longer than all the others, and (by very keen observation it will be also found) one of them will be shorter than all the others. Always, one will carry more torque, horsepower, heat, friction, wear (or your malady of choice) than others and share the rest of the difficulties among its companions, and will lead to premature failure of one belt or another. Those difficulties, along with uneven stretch pattern among the individual belts - thus making it hard to maintain proper tension on each and every belt in the setup, is what gave rise to the new style of belts and pulleys. Even pulleys that are quite carefully manufactured will still have the grooves nearly exactly same angle and depth and diameter- but never exactly. It is actually kind of like shooting fish in a barrel with a shotgun. You have just got to wait and see what comes to view after all the smoke clears. The plane and installation in question did not take advantage of the "poly-V" single belt with multiple grooves - much like the serpentine alternator belt on your 1980 F-150. And the "cog" type belt, as in timing belts and synchronized drives was not an option then, either. Multiple vee-belts were a compromise solution, and the difficulties associated with that solution were what came along with the perceived benefits, like rpm, power, weight, cost. Flash "Peter Dohm" wrote in message . .. "Beryl" wrote in message ... wrote: On Feb 25, 10:58 pm, flybynightkarmarepair wrote: I've since heard from Veeduber (who knew Pazmany, and flew out of the same airport as the prototype) that you could smell the first ship before you could see it, as it burned, errr flew off the first 40 hours with the belts constantly slipping. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Well... mebbe it wasn't quite that bad... :-) But with multiple vee belts it's impossible to keep ALL of them at the same tension. The loosest of them would slip and there was a definite pong of hot rubber after every flight. Eh? I can't visualize it. Either all, or none, slip. I must admit that I am having a little trouble visualizing this one as well--unless that loosest belt was either the farthest from the engine or the farthest from the prop. In those cases, I have no trouble at all. Peter |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pazmany PL4 | (Keith Sowter) | Piloting | 3 | February 25th 08 04:19 AM |
FREE - Homebuilt project - Pazmany PL1 | Eugene Wendland | Home Built | 1 | June 22nd 07 04:06 PM |
Pazmany pL2 plans | frank connaly | Home Built | 10 | November 16th 06 11:36 AM |
Pazmany PL2 strut leak | moni nut | Home Built | 1 | April 27th 04 02:24 AM |
Any Pazmany PL-1/PL-2 owners out there... | Gene Z. Ragan | Home Built | 3 | March 6th 04 04:39 AM |