![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 27, 4:14 pm, jcarlyle wrote:
Poking around inside my fiberglass glider, I discovered a ground lead from the rudder pedal/cable assembly to the negative electrical system bus bar. Interestingly, there was no corresponding ground lead to the metal aileron/elevator control rods. Searching past posts to RAS, I discovered threads talking about the lightning induced destruction of the London Gliding Club K21. In this incident it appears that the metal aileron control rods were the prime cause of the glider's disintegration. In the safety recommendation section Schliecher was quoted as saying non-conducting aileron tubes near the ends of the control circuits might be benefical. Another thread mentioned the factory insertion of metallic mesh into the outer skin layers of the Beech Starships to lessen the effect of lightning strikes. But I couldn't find anything about bonding metal control tubes/cables to the ground of the electrical system. Questions: 1. What is the purpose of such bonding? Would it help at all with lightning protection, or is it intended only to lessen static discharge noise in the radio and other electrical systems? 2. If bonding is useful, shouldn't all of the glider's control tubes/ cables be bonded? 3. What would be the recommended method to effect a bond to aileron and elevator rods? -John As one of the lightning guys in this forum, I'm afraid I can't throw much light on this. I have owned several gliders that had a similar arrangement - all the metalwork around the pilot was grounded or bonded, but not the control rods. The only reason I can think of is to control static electric charges involved with winch launching with a wire, as this can result in the flow of significant electric currents, especially under clouds. Any lightning strike to a non-metallic glider is going to have significant parts of the discharge path through non-conducting parts of the structure or across air gaps. Structural damage will depend on the magnitude and duration of the lightning current. I've seen everything from small holes to complete destruction. Gliders just aren't capable of conducting lightning without damage. Composite aircraft that are required to pass certification for flight in cloud have to pass the appropriate lightning discharge tests and the structure is modified with conducting material to enable this. No glider has been so modified to my knowledge. As a final remark, I have noted that I get sparks from my tow release cable to my leg when I fly under electrified clouds. I use this as a sign that I should be flying somewhere else! Mike |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
9-11 Response, was F-15 grounding | [email protected] | Piloting | 19 | January 4th 08 04:54 AM |
Antonov control cables | John | Home Built | 7 | October 6th 06 12:40 AM |
Grounding of K-7 and K-10s in the UK. | Robertmudd1u | Soaring | 1 | May 28th 04 02:53 AM |
Control cables for gliders | mike maskell | Soaring | 10 | January 1st 04 05:08 AM |