![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"BUFDRVR" a écrit dans le message de
... I guess we'll agree to disagree. Fair enough. Why? The French government fails to provide the most basic assistance to a US strike operation and then has some of its citizens fall victim to Libyan sponsered terrorists. Now you want the US, whose aircrew were *intentionally* put in increased danger by France, to feel sympathy for French civilians? To answer your question : yes, as I want the French to feel sympathy for US civilians whatever may be the sporadic political antagonisms between our countries. Now, the French gvt did not *intentionaly* jeopardize the lives of the US crews. For what purpose, and what was the "increased danger" in avoiding French airspace anyway? But, although I can think of possible explanations for the French decision, I must acknowledge that it remains much of a mystery to me... Somehow I think if the roles were reversed, French citizens would not shed one tear for the loss of US lives. Don't bet on that. As for the overflight rights, you easily forget that along with France, Germany, Spain and Italy also refused to cooperate. Germany *did* cooperate. Really? I thought all involved planes, bombers and support ones, came only from bases in the UK and the 6th Fleet's ships. As for Spain and Italy, their required assistance was the basing of tanker aircraft, not an operation altering issue. Don't forget that Germany, Italy and Spain, like the UK, are NATO members with US bases on their ground, which is not the case of France (though I think the USAF sometimes operates from Istres AB near Marseilles). Still, Spain refused the bombers to overfly its territory, which would have also drastically shortened the trip, and thus forced them to navigate around, over the Atlantic and through the strait of Gibraltar (IIRC, one F-111 made an emergency landing in Spain due to mechanicla problems on its way back to England). But if you look at a map, and as you say Germany provided support, how come the USAF planners didn't choose an eastern, shorter route? Or used only carrier-based aircrafts? France was asked for almost nothing, but it was a critical nothing, and they refused. And yet France allowed the UK-based US bombers to overfly its territory during OIF despite its clear-cut opposition to it... ArVa |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The joke called TSA | Spockstuto | Instrument Flight Rules | 58 | December 27th 04 12:54 PM |
Sick Boeing Joke. | plasticguy | Home Built | 0 | April 1st 04 03:16 PM |
On Topic Joke | Eric Miller | Home Built | 8 | March 6th 04 03:01 AM |
Europe as joke | Cub Driver | Military Aviation | 165 | November 8th 03 10:45 PM |
American joke on the Brits | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 50 | September 30th 03 10:52 PM |