![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"BUFDRVR" a écrit dans le message de
... Now, the French gvt did not *intentionaly* jeopardize the lives of the US crews. For what purpose, and what was the "increased danger" in avoiding French airspace anyway? Approximately five additional hours of flight time into a combat zone. The gulf of Biscaye, the coast of Portugal and the British territory of Gibraltar are not really combat zones, are they? But I agree that 5 hours of flight and the inherent refuelings added to the risks. Judging from the French reaction to nearly anything the US does, a decision made by the US that wound up hurting us would be gleefully trumpeted in France. Iraq today is a good example, French newspapers seem almost to revel in every US casulty. Not true. There is a huge gap between being against a policy and rejoicing over the casualties that ensue from this policy. Some of the newspapers are on the "we told you" line but most of them agree that nobody has to gain from an Iraq that would fell completely into chaos, be led by extremists or return to the previous situation. Now, to be honest I don't think people here are really eager to give billions (we don't have them anyway as we are restrained by European budgetary regulations and already on the verge of being fined) or see soldiers die to solve a situation they don't feel responsible for. And the French bashing, something with no real counterpart here and something I don't think we had ever experienced to that extent, did little to increase the people's will to help the United States. I guess it could change with more involvement from the UN but Rumsfeld himself, unless he's changed his mind, said he'd rather die (or something else less lethal, I don't remember the exact quote) than see French soldiers in Iraq, especially with blue helmets on... They did, however Germany was where the operation was planned and controlled from. That's all that was requested from Germany. Then it could hardly be qualified as active support. It's more like the Germans let the USAF do what it wanted inside its own bases, no?... :-) I believe flying over Spain was insignificant as far as time saving went Hmm... if you enter the Spanish airspace around Bilbao and head straight to Barcelona, approximately following the Pyrenees, you save yourself at LOT of distance and flight time. From Germany, how are you going to get to Libya without overflying France? Overfly Austria and Italy. Italy may say yes, but I severely doubt Austria would. Yes, I guess you're right. And yet France allowed the UK-based US bombers to overfly its territory during OIF despite its clear-cut opposition to it... That seemed bizzare to me. I'm suprised we even asked... But I'm not suprised we agreed. As soon as the US intervention seemed inevitable, Chirac made it clear that France would not interfere with the US war machine, making BTW the delirious allegations of French weapon and spare part deliveries to Iraq even more ludicrous. ArVa |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The joke called TSA | Spockstuto | Instrument Flight Rules | 58 | December 27th 04 12:54 PM |
Sick Boeing Joke. | plasticguy | Home Built | 0 | April 1st 04 03:16 PM |
On Topic Joke | Eric Miller | Home Built | 8 | March 6th 04 03:01 AM |
Europe as joke | Cub Driver | Military Aviation | 165 | November 8th 03 10:45 PM |
American joke on the Brits | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 50 | September 30th 03 10:52 PM |