A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Ercoupe



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #19  
Old March 11th 08, 06:20 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,969
Default Ercoupe

Phil J wrote in news:5d15f685-058a-44f2-a9b2-
:

On Mar 11, 10:22*am, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Phil J wrote in news:875f835d-861f-4472-80b2-
:







On Mar 9, 3:06*pm, Dan wrote:
On Mar 9, 3:58 pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote:


Heard of it, never saw one.


Seen a few. There was one for sale on Barnstormers recently.
Bertie


Awful because?


No rudders. Even the ones built by Alon, which had pedals,

didn't
have
decent yaw control.


The big problem with them is, they;re 'idiot proof'. When you

make
something idiot proof, all you do is breed a better class of

idiot.
Idiots are like antibiotic resistant staff infections like that.


Bertie


Hmmm..


Good point. The "spin proof" claim would indicate less than full
control authority, which comes in handy from time to time.


I wonder if there's a way to correlate "improved safety features"

with
"increased accident rate."


Kinda like riding a bike -- the sense of protection a helmet

provides
may encourage risky behavior.


Hmmmm...


Dan


From what I have read, the Ercoupe had a few problems. *If you lost
the engine, it didn't glide worth a damn. *And if you let it get

too
slow on approach it would develope a huge sink rate. *If you didn't
speed up, you couldn't flare enough to arrest the sink rate and you
would slam into the ground.


Actually, the flight manual actually said that if you were to high

and
needed to scrub off altitude, you should pull the stick back into

your
gut and close the throttle. I did it and it does work and is pretty
controllable,but it is very undcomfortable.



As the years went by and the main gear oleos got old, or when the

nose
gear was replaced with a dual-fork strut, they tended to sit too

nose-
high on the ground, and that made them more difficult to land,
especially in crosswinds, because the angle-of-attack stayed too

high
at touchdown.


I think the mains use rubber donuts, but I'm not sure.

Bertie- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


You're right, it was rubber doughnuts. I guess they just got stale as
the years went by.

Good guess on my part then, cuz that's all it was. it was a popular
method of shock absorbption back when. Probably remained on th eairplane
through the Mooney variants at all. Why change what works?



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ercoupe Opinions Doofus P. Leadbottom Owning 17 August 24th 05 10:16 PM
Jay Honeck Ercoupe on a roof [email protected] Piloting 6 July 13th 05 10:54 PM
Jay Honeck-Ercoupe on a roof [email protected] Owning 0 July 11th 05 12:19 AM
Around the Rim in an Ercoupe Bob Fry Piloting 1 April 30th 04 04:09 AM
What do you think about ercoupe ianf Owning 9 August 27th 03 11:48 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.