Families of soldiers condemn Bush's war

Vince Brannigan wrote in message ...
Kevin Brooks wrote:
Vince Brannigan wrote in message ...

Kevin Brooks wrote:

"Leslie Swartz" wrote in message ...


Vince:

- What about the 30 or so 55 gal drums of Lewisite?
- What about the mobile chem labs?
- What about the Rycin?
- What about the Botulinum?
- What about the anthrax cultures?
- What about the residuals at various dumping sites?

How much "evidence of WMD;" or, more to the point, "evidence of WMD
programs" is enough for you?

Steve Swartz


You are forgetting that Vkince and his ilk only consider it a WMD
program if they can point to a physical and truly massive stockpile of
active agents already in a weaponized state. That approach makes it so
much easier for them to continue to bash Bush and the US. And BTW: you
can add the development of the tactical ballistic missiles that
exceeded the range allowed per the resolutions/cease fire agreement in
your list as well.

I'll take a single solitary weapon ready for use.


Those missiles?

not WMDS

Your definition of WMD's seems to change with the argument; I do
believe you previously asserted that they were not limited to
chem/bio/nuke devices? But now you seem to find the opposing
definition more suitable. How typical; if the facts don't fit the
framework you chose, change the framework, huh?





I don't blame you; if I were you (something that I shudder to even
consider), I'd probably also have snipped without attribution the
sorry, rancid bile you previously posted that brought on the following
response.

You overly sanctimonious son of a bitch. You are without a doubt the
last individual in this country who should look any veteran "in the
eye" on *any* day of the year, with your self-serving 'I didn't serve
because it was inconvenient, and I don't like to take orders'
bull****. You have done nothing but scorn the efforts and sacrifices
of those who did serve, and those who died, from before the time this
operation even started. I rarely descend to the level of actually
cussing out a slimy, yellow bellied little cretin such as yourself,
but you are singularly deserving of every bit of contempt I can
scrounge up. Feel free to (again) invite me up for a personal review
of these comments--the last time you did that you quickly
backscrabbled into the "but if you do show up, I'll file suit" crap
when it came time for the rubber to meet the road, so I have no doubt
any renewed sense of backbone you might dredge up will once again
prove to be a merely transient gesture on your part. What a sad little
excuse for a man you are.

Im sure you are sorry that your boy couldn't find the WMDs he promised.
But the American soldiers are just as dead.

Something that you have little concern over, I am sure.

Im sure your suggestion
of violence can find an outlet but i'm not your punching bag.
you are welcome to show up and debate
but a real man who makes threats stands up and takes the consequences.
So are you making a threat of personal injury or not?

Vkince, I am not in the threats business, just as you are not in the
backbone business. When you *do*, as you have done in the past, go out
of your way to invite someone so demonstrably incensed by your
putrescent nature to a personal encounter, it would be reasonable for
that party to accept that as a challenge. But, again lacking that
required backbone, you follow up with your usual barricade of "if you
do show up, I'll file suit" crap. Which allows you to I guess, in your
little twisted world, maintain some illusion of bravado on your part,
without of course placing yourself at any risk, which is of course
your underlying core value; "never risk yourself, no matter what". I
guess that your previous brush with the concept of reality did however
have one beneficial outcome--I have not noticed you hurling about your
Nazi incriminations with the same carelessness you previously
demonstrated. In the end you remain one of those slimy little cretins
who never could bring yourself to enter the arena, instead feeling
that the struggles of those within it somehow made you a bit more
courageous, especially if you are able to hurl a few rotten tomatoes
in their direction from the safety of the cheap seats. But in reality
you would not rate as a pimple on the ass of the lowest ranking
private soldier who ever served anywhere, in any capacity. As I said
before, what a sad little excuse for a man you are.

Brooks



lets jsut be very clear

Vince