![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Maynard wrote in
: On 2008-03-15, Jay Honeck wrote: I used to fly a Cessna Cutlass. When I checked in using that type, controllers often came back with "November xxxxx" because they seldom heard that type, I suppose...or they said "Douglas xxxxx" or "Cardinal xxxxx" or some such. We long ago gave up saying "Pathfinder November five six niner nine tree" -- all you get is a lot of "What's that?" from controllers. We just say "Dakota five six niner niner tree" now, and they all get it. I'm curious to see what the reactions to "Zodiac five five zulu charlie" will be. There's not much I can replace it with. What do I tell ATC when they ask what that is? (Aside from "my airplane", of course.) Normally it's "experimental" for a homebuilt. Bertie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fessing up time on callsigns | José Herculano | Naval Aviation | 26 | February 5th 05 08:31 AM |
On the subject of callsigns - what was the most preposterous you have seen? | Giz | Naval Aviation | 27 | September 10th 03 04:58 AM |
On the subject of callsigns - what was the most preposterous | Pechs1 | Naval Aviation | 6 | August 31st 03 02:51 PM |
Callsigns from hell... | José Herculano | Naval Aviation | 27 | August 30th 03 04:44 PM |
On the subject of callsigns - what was the most preposterousyou have seen? | Doug \Woody\ and Erin Beal | Naval Aviation | 1 | August 26th 03 03:45 AM |