A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Stalls and Thoughts



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old March 17th 08, 01:51 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bertie the Bunyip[_24_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,969
Default Stalls and Thoughts

Dudley Henriques wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Dudley Henriques wrote in
:

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
"Blueskies" wrote in
. net:

LeVier did a lot of the high mach number dive tests in the 38,
and there definitely was a compressibility problem, mach tuck;
the

whole
works. I know they added speed brakes but not sure at exactly
what stage. The engine rotation switch was early on in the
program according to Ethell; I believe in the YP38 stage before
the first production run. If I'm not mistaken, the high mach
dives came after the switch but I'm not at all certain of that.

--
Dudley Henriques
All the -38s sold to England had same rotation direction engines
on both sides all the way through. Just another odd thing...


Are you sure about that?


Bertie
I heard the same thing. The Brits raised hell about what they

considered
a high degree of possibility for unnecessary maintainence due to the
handed engines. On the practical side, the Brits had ordered a ton
of P40's which used the V1710 Allison with a right handed prop. The
word

we
got was that the brits wanted the Allison's on the 38's to be
interchangeable with the P40 to cut down on cost.



Well, that's reasonable. Never heard that before. Could be an urban
legend based on one photo of an airplane field kitted with two RH
engines. A bit like the Fokker DR1 that got an odd aileron and
started a legend that they all had one smaller than the other to
compensate for torque.


Bertie

Possible?? Torque correction IS in roll and not yaw as is the common
belief :-)



Oh the things had torque issues alright, but some nerd of an historian
has proven that there was only one DR1 with mismatched ailerons. The
eraly ones had one size and the later ones had another and a field
repair resulted in the one with two odd ailerons. Since it was a good
pictiure showing them clearly and someone did a detailed drawing basd on
it, it got lodged in folklore. There were airplanes that had larger
wings n the left for this purpose however. Ansaldo, for one.


Bertie
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Thinking about stalls WingFlaps Piloting 43 April 12th 08 09:35 PM
Stalls?? Ol Shy & Bashful Piloting 155 February 22nd 08 03:24 PM
why my plane stalls Grandss Piloting 22 August 14th 05 07:48 AM
Practice stalls on your own? [email protected] Piloting 34 May 30th 05 05:23 PM
Wing tip stalls mat Redsell Soaring 5 March 13th 04 05:07 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.