![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
robert arndt wrote:
What? "Projekt _Saucer_"?!? ROTFLOL!! Why the **** would the SS name the project "Saucer" - that isn't a German word! That is a postwar English translation, sorry. Should be "Projekt Flugkreisel". Translating "Flugkreisel" as "saucer" ... cute. If they translated the rest of the Nazi documents equally accurate, it would explain a lot :-(. As far as I understand the information recieved by the Thule/Vril mediums they were instructed to construct a flight machine only. Some of the RFZ and Vril photos clearly show MGs but I am not certain about the MK-108 claims. I can't tell from the photos given if that protruding gun is a 30mm cannon. Anyway, the Germans certainly would have tried arming some even though their type of flight made them useless as fighters. High speed and manoeverability made them "useless" as fighters? Hey, the Nazis sure set their requirements rather high, didn't they ;-)? Then why mention "certain developments in the Third Reich at the close of WW2" in Project Bluebook? It is an official document and they certainly aren't referring to a Me-262 when comparing Reich technology to '60s sightings of alien disc craft. Second, the USAF denied the Flugelrads for 51 years... then suddenly admitted the Germans had them in 1996... "but that they were highly unstable". Sorry, we get the admission but no photos of any kind or flight footage (which the USAF certainly has). "certainly" has? Have you _seen_ the footage? If not, how can you say "certainly"?? No, you are full of **** Finally!! I began to wonder how long it would take to draw a real flame :-)! since Lockheed and Northrop fly such black budget craft today. Again, how do you know? ... Oh yes, I know, it's "all over the internet, so it must be true!" LOL! What flew over Belgium in the early '90s was a military aircraft and it is photographed, witnesses by hundreds, and confirmed by civilian radar, military radar, Fighter radar, and even spy sat. Note the craft has no jet engines, so what is it flying on Andreas? The "best" photo, which the "UFO community" has been distributing, shows three blobs of light in the night sky - and _nothing else! No structures, no background to determine scale, _nothing_! So how the **** do you know how this craft was powered?! The lights could as well come from (and probably _did_ come from) a simple ultralight aircraft (which is _indeed_ not jet-powered ;-) ). [...] You lie Andreas. When?? I admit that I provoked you with sarcastic remarks, but _lies_? No, sorry, there were none. If you examined the files, photos, flight footage, you are the kind of person who would STILL DENY the evidence. Have you _seen_ the files, photos, etc.? How can you know they will support your claims? Just because you say so?? Your behaviour confirms _exactly_ what I said - conspiracy nuts like you are _so sure_ that they are right, that _every_ evidence which doesn't fit into their views is simply dismissed as being incomplete or faked. And BTW, all I need to "believe" is film or photo evidence, which several independent experts confirm as genuine and un-"doctored". I pity you. Which person is more decieved- the one who only believes "official" history or the one that believes we've been lied to? Time is on my side... Do you live forever ;-)? Andreas |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|