![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Darryl Ramm wrote:
On Mar 31, 6:50 pm, Sarah Anderson wrote: Greg Arnold wrote: I see they want to require transponders in all gliders, with the transponders always on. Nice summary. And, in compensation we'd get the low, low transponder code of 0440 I've never heard that low codes would save power, maybe they just wouldn't ping it as often as 1200 Sarah Ah, that is not possible. The simple answer is all transponders seeing an interrogation signal will reply. The SSR can interrogate the transponder to send it's code (Mode A) or altitude (Mode C). There is no concept of the SSR being able to "address" a transponder. I assume what the NTSB is referring to is the duty cycle of the reply transmission, I'm too tired right now to figure out the actual encoding, but if 0440 has a lower duty cycle than 1200, it will save some amount of power. How much, I don't know... Marc |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
go to NTSB.GOV | [email protected] | Piloting | 0 | August 15th 05 08:34 PM |
FAA-NTSB | [email protected] | Piloting | 4 | January 25th 05 01:34 PM |
NTSB | EDR | Piloting | 22 | July 2nd 04 03:03 AM |
Is the the EX-NTSB Guy? | Gig Giacona | Piloting | 2 | January 16th 04 04:01 PM |
NTSB 830.5 & 830.15? | Mike Noel | Owning | 2 | July 8th 03 05:51 AM |