![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"I don't think there is any argument whatsoever here. Florida sees the
aircraft entering Florida as "use" of Florida (air) facilities, not a "sales" tax on the transaction." This is not at all correct. "Use tax" has a specific legal definition, which doesn't refer to the "use" of a specific something. In the context being discussed, the use tax is the amount of sales tax that would have been collected on the transaction if it had occurred in Florida, minus the amount of the sales tax (if any) collected by another state. This same type of tax is frequently collected when one changes an automobile registration from one state to another. The purpose of these types of taxes is to prevent someone from purchasing a big-ticket item in a low tax state, then registering/using it in a high tax state. Assume you live in State 'A', which has a sales tax rate of 10%. If you bought an airplane for $100,000 in State 'A' and kept it there, you would pay $10,000 in sales tax to State 'A'. But if you went to State 'B', which has a sales tax rate of 5% to buy the $100,000 airplane, you would pay $5,000 in sales tax to State 'B'. However, if you bought the airplane in State 'B' and begin keeping/using it in State 'A', State 'A' would then charge you a "use tax" of $5,000, or the difference between the $5,000 sales tax you paid to State 'B' and the amount the tax would have been had you purchased the airplane in State 'A'. Again, this is to prevent residents of State 'A' from buying big-ticket items in other states in order to avoid the (high) sales taxes in State 'A'. This whole thing is nothing more than someone incorrectly interpreting some very common tax regulations. From some of the posts I have read here and elsewhere, this interpretation may be a deliberate attempt to create panic. But Florida will no more try to impose a use tax if you fly your airplane there for a two week vacation than they would if you drove your car there for a two week vacation. "WJRFlyBoy" wrote in message . .. On Tue, 01 Apr 2008 12:28:45 -0500, Jim Logajan wrote: http://www.fata.aero/news.asp?news_id=88&display=yes So basically he wasn't charged any sales or use tax. That is not what the A.N.N. story claimed. The Cirrus owner simply assumed that the advice he heard over the phone was valid and canceled his plans. This Cirrus owner and the Cirrus owner in the OP are not necessarily the same person/plane. Here's FDOT's position paper on the matter. http://dor.myflorida.com/dor/taxes/s...aft_owner.html I don't think there is any argument whatsoever here. Florida sees the aircraft entering Florida as "use" of Florida (air) facilities, not a "sales" tax on the transaction. They clearly state they do ramp checks. Does this mean Sun n Fun attendees are liable for use taxation? Sure does. Does this mean that there is a likelihood they will be taxed? I don't see the likelihood at all. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Just Bought A Plane? STAY OUT OF FLORIDA ! | WJRFlyBoy | Piloting | 156 | April 15th 08 12:52 PM |
Bought my first plane:-D | EridanMan | Owning | 8 | May 16th 06 08:22 PM |
bought the plane today | houstondan | Owning | 30 | April 30th 06 06:34 AM |
I just bought my 1st Plane...Thanks to the newsgroup! | WinstonCup | Owning | 24 | February 10th 04 11:46 PM |
I bought X-Plane and I want to share my experience | Bruce Shankle | Products | 0 | July 21st 03 08:25 AM |