A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Carrier Islands



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #14  
Old November 17th 03, 08:49 AM
Dave Eadsforth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Bob McKellar
writes


Thomas W Ping wrote:

Are there aviation-related reasons why the starboard side is favored
for the island, or is it a purely naval issue? If the latter, did the
practice come about because the first pioneering carriers were
arbitrarily drawn up that way and the configuration simply stuck as a
matter of tradition, or were there more significant reasons for the
convention?

--
Thomas Winston Ping


A somewhat silly what-if:

Since the idea of using an angled deck is quite simple ( though brilliant,
even if it did come from them Brits ) what would have been different if it
had been used from the beginning?

A very sensible what-if, but at some time someone would have suggested
an observation tower of some sort, on an angled deck or straight.

Re. the angled deck (invented by a brilliant and modest Brit, who had an
excellent relationship with the USN dating from his wartime service in
Washington) it seems that when aircraft carriers were first conceived,
and aircraft speeds were very low, putting a straight runway on a ship
seemed simple and obvious. Only when aircraft speeds became much higher
did the problems of overrunning on landing manifest themselves. Even
then, with the naval aviation world seemingly fixated on the straight
deck, other schemes were considered first, including the rubber mat
landing strip, and even a two-storey concept with aircraft landing on
the top layer. When the angled deck was first suggested at an MoD
committee in London, the response was amusement and mild derision, but
to their credit the USN reacted at once to the idea and painted an
angled deck on a carrier within weeks.

As a beginning guess, I would say fewer crashes into islands, parked
aircraft etc.,


Agree that one...

and more losses to planes dribbling off the end of the
angle unable to regain flight.


Not necessarily - unable to regain flight in the old days seems to have
been mostly caused by late or over-cautious application of throttle.

Bob McKellar


Cheers,

Dave

--
Dave Eadsforth
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
B-29s & P-51s Strike Japan plus "Carrier Franklin" at Zeno's Drive-In zeno Home Built 1 October 4th 04 11:19 PM
B-29s & P-51s Strike Japan plus "Carrier Franklin" at Zeno's Drive-In zeno Instrument Flight Rules 0 October 4th 04 05:32 PM
Can the F-14 carry six AIM-54s and land on carrier? Matthew G. Saroff Military Aviation 1 October 29th 03 08:14 PM
C-130 Hercules on a carrier - possible ?? Jan Gelbrich Military Aviation 10 September 21st 03 04:47 PM
launching V-1s from an aircraft carrier Gordon Military Aviation 34 July 29th 03 11:14 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.