![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "David Lesher" wrote in message ... "Simon Robbins" writes: Rather than lack of oxygen, I imagine it would be that the lower air pressure simply means the rotor is unable to achieve lift without an unacceptable increase in rotor speed, which would likely overstress the engines and gearbox. I've wondered what keeps you from building a high-altitude version. I envison big fat blades and an engine design for thin air. Or is there some other issue I'm not seeing? Lack of demand most likely. Not a lot of places to land on mountains that tall. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Fwd: [BD4] Source of HIGH CHTs on O-320 and O-360 FOUND! | Bruce A. Frank | Home Built | 1 | July 4th 04 07:28 PM |
GPS Altitude with WAAS | Phil Verghese | Instrument Flight Rules | 42 | October 5th 03 12:39 AM |
Low and high altitude airways | David Megginson | Instrument Flight Rules | 7 | September 9th 03 01:18 AM |
High Altitude operations (Turbo charge???) | Andre | Home Built | 68 | July 11th 03 11:59 PM |