If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
T-18 more roomy than I had thought it would be
One friendly and generous T-18 builder let me sit in his standard T-18
down at SNF. I'm 6'2" and had thought I wouldn't have enough leg room. Boy was I surprised! turns out, I had more than enough leg room. The main thing that was tight was the fact the plane I sat in was the original fuselage, with the 38" width. The wide body version with the 40" cabin width would be fine. The headroom was tight with the canopy closed, I had to tilt my head forward, but the builder, who was a bit short, said he had a 5 inch thick seat cushion on the seat bottom. With a 2" cushion of temperfoam, I would have had enough room. I sure do like the look of the T-18, more than the Van's designs. But that's just a personal preferance. I just can't get past that big rectangular wing. Reminds me of an old Hershey bar winged Cherokee. Another T-18 builder told me that it's basically a dying design. The folding wing of both the T-18 and the Mustang II appeal to me. But the t-18 owner said he knew of no one that actually folded his wings and towed their airplane home. So maybe that idea isn't as practical in actual practice as in theory. And with a 180hp engine, the T-18 owner said he couldn't do a full power runup with the stick all the way back, without the tail coming off the ground. Seems the 180hp T-18's are a bit nose heavy, especially with a constant speed prop. I've noticed in accident reports, nose overs are the most common occurance. One reason is probably that the gear is swept back, and as the nose rotates down, the gear moves aft, making the situation worse. Van's have the same geomety. The Mustang II, with the gear swept forward has the advantage on that one. But the approach speed of the T-18 and M-II are a lot higher than a Van's. So short runways are out with those. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Low towing thought | Martin Gregorie | Soaring | 45 | March 13th 07 03:00 AM |
And you thought AMARC was bad.... | Ron | Aviation Photos | 18 | February 2nd 07 05:27 AM |
Just when I thought I'd heard it all:-) | Dudley Henriques | Piloting | 14 | November 23rd 05 08:18 PM |
A thought on BRS | Martin Gregorie | Soaring | 47 | April 29th 04 06:34 AM |
I thought some of these are classics | goneill | Soaring | 0 | April 8th 04 10:51 AM |