A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

More fuel for thought



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #25  
Old April 15th 08, 07:55 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,892
Default More fuel for thought

Jim Logajan wrote:
wrote:
Andrew Sarangan wrote:
There is 30 horsepower of solar radiation falling on a Cessna 172's
wing that we are simply throwing away.


Unless I dropped a decimal somewhere, there is about 16 M^2 of wing
area on a C-172.


At ~1000W/m^2 insolation, that yields an "ideal" max power of ~16,000 W.


30 HP is 22.4 kW; there isn't that much energy in sunlight.


Since there are ~746 W/HP, by my reckoning the sunlight power on a C-172
wing is ~21 HP. Still not bad, though not sure where Andrew got 30 HP.


He's using 1.4 kW, which is about the max you'll ever get.

Both of you are ignoring the fact that you get that only if the angle
beteen the sun and your collector is 90 degrees, otherwise you have
to multiply by the sine of the angle to get the real energy per unit
area.

The challenge is extracting the full solar spectrum and storing it.
But there are no fundamental scientific reasons why this is not
achievable.


You mean other than we haven't a clue how to do it in the real world?

There are no fundamental scientific reasons why we can't:

Convert light into electricity with 90% efficiency.


Real world system efficiencies of 40% should be possible today - using
solar thermal (e.g. solar troughs).


Lab efficiencies are already around 40%.

Using collectors or concentrators doesn't change the overall efficiency,
it only makes the area of the converter required for a given amount
of energy smaller; the total area remains the same.

And for photocells, it runs the temperature up which plays hell with
the usefull life and reliability.

Cure cancer.


That is already being done for some forms of cancer. Next time try "Cure
the common cold." (And strictly speaking the body does that on its own - it
just makes you feel miserable while it goes about it!)


Cure cancer as in take these pills twice a day for a week, not irradiate
or cut out a chunk of the body and hope there isn't too much collateral
damage to the body, though with stuff like proton therapy the irradiation
stuff is getting pretty good.

Produce sustainable fusion.


Always 30 years off.... ;-)


Convert junk mail and coffee grounds into 100 LL.


An interesting idea. :-)


Mr. Fusion; I forgot about the banana peels.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Low towing thought Martin Gregorie Soaring 45 March 13th 07 03:00 AM
And you thought AMARC was bad.... Ron Aviation Photos 18 February 2nd 07 05:27 AM
Thought Police Michael Baldwin, Bruce Products 0 November 17th 06 06:58 AM
Just when I thought I'd heard it all:-) Dudley Henriques Piloting 14 November 23rd 05 08:18 PM
A thought on BRS Martin Gregorie Soaring 47 April 29th 04 06:34 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.