![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 17, 11:27 am, "Robert M. Gary" wrote:
On Apr 17, 2:53 am, tman inv@lid wrote: Flown C172's for quite a while, and never had anybody in the back. Now I'm planning on quite a trip, with 2 pax and luggage. The biggest problem with flying a little overgross is the same problem with flying at high density altitude. The plane will perform different and a pilot who isn't expecting this can run into serious problems. The site picture over the nose will look a bit different. This is why I always teach my students to climb out on airspeed. I know some CFIs focus on the site pitch picture but that only works with consistant weight, altitude, etc. Many pilots have bitten the big one because they keep pulling the nose up when climbing out of mountain airports until they stall it. They keep trying to achieve the site picture their CFI taught them down in the valley. -robert, CFII Consider this. When was the last time the airplane was weighed? Does your engine performance exactly the same as when it was manufactured? Do you get the same cruise speeds as published on the AFM? Even if the airplane is perfectly airworthy, and all maintenance done properly, you don't know if the engine is producing 160HP (or whatever the rated power for your airplane). There is no signature in the logbook that certifies that the airplane engine has been tested and found to produce the specified power. I have flown rentals that flew like a 120HP Cessna instead of a 160 HP. RPM can't tell you the true power because every airplane uses a different pitch prop. Chances are this airplane is a little heavier, and engine is little weaker. Almost every rental airplane I have flown does not cruise as the book says. Takeoff and landing performance has a lot to do with pilot capability, but cruise performance is a good benchmark that does not involve pilot capability. If you have ever flown an airplane at max gross or close to it, then you have flown it overgross. Legally the airplane may not be over gross, but practically it is. Not only do I recommend against flying overgross, I do not recommend flying at gross either, unless you are the owner of that airplane and are very familiar its performance. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
My wife getting scared | Paul Tomblin | Piloting | 271 | October 11th 07 08:19 PM |
Scared of mid-airs | Frode Berg | Piloting | 355 | August 20th 06 05:27 PM |
UBL wants a truce - he's scared of the CIA UAV | John Doe | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | January 19th 06 08:58 PM |
Max gross weight | Chris | Piloting | 21 | October 5th 04 08:22 PM |
Scared and trigger-happy | John Galt | Military Aviation | 5 | January 31st 04 12:11 AM |