A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

How indicative of agility are max G numbers?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #5  
Old November 20th 03, 05:31 PM
Ken Duffey
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mark Irvine wrote:

mmm, not so sure, the physiology of the human body is such that the brain
needs that blood! While modern G suits help to limit the surge of blood to
the feet they cannot totally stop it. Also the human head head weighs
around 4 - 5 kg. At 9 G the effective weight is 36 - 45 kg. That does not
take into account the additional weight of the helmet. That is some load
through the neck, come to think of it is is like 1/2 of me being on my own
head with no support, ouch...

I still think that the human is the limiting factor.

Mark


Snip......

Interestingly, the Russians have a different approach - instead of trying to
make the systems cope with the G stresses, they tend to select squat, fit men -
and then train them to tolerate G, rather than trying to have systems (G-suits,
cockpit environment etc) that try to cater for all body sizes.

In other words - start with the best bodies - then add the systems.

During a visit to Kubinka, near Moscow, (the home of the Russian aerobatic
teams - the Russian Knights and the Swifts) in 1993, they told us that during a
visit by the Blue Angels they swapped back-seat rides in F/A-18's and Su-27's &
MiG-29's.

The US Navy pilots (who are no slouches!) were amazed at the Russian pilot's
ability to tolerate high-G forces.

In fact they (the Russian pilots) pointed to one of their number (a short,
bull-necked, squat, MiG-29/ Swifts pilot) and said that he held the squadron
record at 11G - and this was a regular occurrence !

They also laughingly stated that when he joined the squadron he was over six
feet tall !!

(They also pointed to another pilot who had a large hook nose - and said that
he was a parrot rather than a swift !!! - they had a great sense of humour).

Also - wasn't there a discussion on this NG some time ago about the ability of
females to tolerate highr G forces than men ?? Something to do with their
physiology (lower centre of gravity ??)

Or am I opening up a whole new can of worms ??

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++
Ken Duffey - Flanker Freak & Russian Aviation Enthusiast
Flankers Website - http://www.flankers.co.uk/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Old Plans, New Part Numbers [email protected] Home Built 3 December 16th 04 10:25 AM
NACA Numbers??? c hinds Home Built 3 October 11th 04 09:40 PM
Press fit numbers? Boelkowj Home Built 1 April 29th 04 06:51 PM
Any Canadians Who Can Provide Numbers on a Champ, Taylorcraft, or Luscombe with Warp Drive Propeller? Larry Smith Home Built 7 December 21st 03 09:39 PM
Darpa contract numbers - = krusty = - Home Built 9 July 23rd 03 03:22 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.