A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

USAF F-16 Instructor Discusses Flying Into MOAs



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10  
Old April 22nd 08, 03:16 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,953
Default USAF F-16 Instructor Discusses Flying Into MOAs

On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 20:12:26 -0500, "Viperdoc"
wrote in
:

Typically, once cleared into the MOA, ATC will give the call MARSA (IIRC),
which is military assumes responsibility for separation of aircraft. The FAA
rules for spacing and formation flight no longer apply at this point.


Of course, in this case (or any case) no ATC clearance was required
for transit through the MOA; it's Joint Use airspace.

I do find it interesting that the Pilatus pilot claims to have been
receiving "Flight Following" (Usually that refers to radar traffic
advisory service.), but makes no mention of ATC informing him of the
hot status of the MOA.


A rejoin can also be difficult, especially at night with NVG, or with big
differences in AS.

Usual military comm is also UHF, not VHF. In fact, I do not every recall a
flight in a F-16 that I took where we did anything but uniform.


If I recall correctly from the AvWeb pod-casts, the F-16 was VHF
equipped. The Pilatus pilot didn't indicate if he was guarding 121.5
MHz.


You can criticize the military all you want, but the reason they practice
this is to protect our resources like cities. By making a visual ID on a
plane, and get its attention, they might be able to discern the intent of a
pilot who entered an airspace where they didn't belong.


That's not what happened in this instance.

I personally would rather be intercepted than shot down.


I personally would prefer that ALL flights comply with the FARs.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
USAF F-16 Instructor Discusses Flying Into MOAs Larry Dighera Piloting 39 April 8th 08 07:03 PM
US Military now wants more northern NY airspace to expand those MOAs Peter R. Piloting 7 June 14th 07 01:30 PM
Gliders, transponders, and MOAs Greg Arnold Soaring 2 May 26th 06 05:13 PM
There has _got_ to be a book that discusses 'practical welding' Mike Owning 2 April 16th 06 11:15 PM
Mayor Daley discusses airport on Today Show 2/26 Jenny Wrinkler Piloting 4 February 28th 04 05:15 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.