![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "monkey" wrote in message om... "Dudley Henriques" wrote in message hlink.net... "Hobo" wrote in message ... How indicative of maneaverability are the max G numbers of fighter aircraft? You can pull max g all the way out to the structural limits of the airframe.....but at what turn rate?.....radius? And where does that put you in relation to the adversary? (Delta Ps) In order to determine maneuverability, the g ability to pull g has to be married into an overall performance graph; then this graph must be compared to other aircraft. You can't just use one specific to determine a fighter's performance, or ability to maneuver. It takes the integration of many different factors, all interfaced into the flight envelope to determine maneuverability. The ability to pull g is inherent in every fighter......what you do with that g, and WHERE in the envelope you pull that g are much more pertinent to maneuverability than the fact that you CAN pull g. Then, after you determine all this, there's roll rate, stability, axis coupling limits, and a whole slew of other good stuff to feed into the equation. It's a complicated process. G, and the ability to pull g, are simply factors in this HUGE overall process of determining maneuverability. Hope this helps a bit. Dudley Henriques International Fighter Pilots Fellowship Commercial Pilot/ CFI Retired For personal email, please replace the z's with e's. dhenriquesATzarthlinkDOTnzt G is not really important from a tactical perspective, what is important in a turning engagement is turn rate or turn radius; which of these should be maximized depends on the situation (eg defensive, offensive, 2 vs 1 circle fight). I won't get into the specifics except to state that g is not a very significant measure of fighter performance. monkey canadian fighter pilot I can't tell if you are trying to add to what I said, or trying to correct what I've said in some way? From what I'm reading, I believe what you are saying is EXACTLY what I just said....which is correct! :-) Dudley Henriques International Fighter Pilots Fellowship Commercial Pilot/ CFI Retired For personal email, please replace the z's with e's. dhenriquesATzarthlinkDOTnzt |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Old Plans, New Part Numbers | [email protected] | Home Built | 3 | December 16th 04 10:25 AM |
NACA Numbers??? | c hinds | Home Built | 3 | October 11th 04 09:40 PM |
Press fit numbers? | Boelkowj | Home Built | 1 | April 29th 04 06:51 PM |
Any Canadians Who Can Provide Numbers on a Champ, Taylorcraft, or Luscombe with Warp Drive Propeller? | Larry Smith | Home Built | 7 | December 21st 03 09:39 PM |
Darpa contract numbers | - = krusty = - | Home Built | 9 | July 23rd 03 03:22 AM |