A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

How indicative of agility are max G numbers?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9  
Old November 20th 03, 08:21 PM
Dudley Henriques
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"monkey" wrote in message
om...
"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message

hlink.net...
"Hobo" wrote in message
...


How indicative of maneaverability are the max G numbers of fighter
aircraft?


You can pull max g all the way out to the structural limits of the
airframe.....but at what turn rate?.....radius? And where does that put

you
in relation to the adversary? (Delta Ps)
In order to determine maneuverability, the g ability to pull g has to be
married into an overall performance graph; then this graph must be

compared
to other aircraft. You can't just use one specific to determine a

fighter's
performance, or ability to maneuver. It takes the integration of many
different factors, all interfaced into the flight envelope to determine
maneuverability. The ability to pull g is inherent in every
fighter......what you do with that g, and WHERE in the envelope you pull
that g are much more pertinent to maneuverability than the fact that you

CAN
pull g.
Then, after you determine all this, there's roll rate, stability, axis
coupling limits, and a whole slew of other good stuff to feed into the
equation.
It's a complicated process. G, and the ability to pull g, are simply

factors
in this HUGE overall process of determining maneuverability.
Hope this helps a bit.
Dudley Henriques
International Fighter Pilots Fellowship
Commercial Pilot/ CFI Retired
For personal email, please replace
the z's with e's.
dhenriquesATzarthlinkDOTnzt


G is not really important from a tactical perspective, what is
important in a turning engagement is turn rate or turn radius; which
of these should be maximized depends on the situation (eg defensive,
offensive, 2 vs 1 circle fight). I won't get into the specifics except
to state that g is not a very significant measure of fighter
performance.

monkey
canadian fighter pilot


I can't tell if you are trying to add to what I said, or trying to correct
what I've said in some way? From what I'm reading, I believe what you are
saying is EXACTLY what I just said....which is correct!
:-)
Dudley Henriques
International Fighter Pilots Fellowship
Commercial Pilot/ CFI Retired
For personal email, please replace
the z's with e's.
dhenriquesATzarthlinkDOTnzt



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Old Plans, New Part Numbers [email protected] Home Built 3 December 16th 04 10:25 AM
NACA Numbers??? c hinds Home Built 3 October 11th 04 09:40 PM
Press fit numbers? Boelkowj Home Built 1 April 29th 04 06:51 PM
Any Canadians Who Can Provide Numbers on a Champ, Taylorcraft, or Luscombe with Warp Drive Propeller? Larry Smith Home Built 7 December 21st 03 09:39 PM
Darpa contract numbers - = krusty = - Home Built 9 July 23rd 03 03:22 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.