![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2008-04-24, Brian wrote:
Depends on what you mean by "the impossible turn". If you mean turning back at 200 AGL, yeah, that one's pretty much impossible. If you mean 600 AGL, it's pretty much possible in the average aircraft. (Hell, that's pattern altitude at EFD!) The line lies somewhere in between. It is statements like this that get pilots killed. It's statements like 'never turn, always land straight ahead' that also gets pilots killed. There are plenty of airfields where going straight ahead is quite possibly the worst option, and the best survivability options are at least a 120 degree turn away from whatever point you're at when at 600' AGL. The only thing you can do is use the best judgement at the time. You get one chance - it may be wrong. Sometimes, trying to turn back might be wrong. Sometimes doing anything *other* than trying to turn back might be wrong. In gliders, every glider pilot is taught "the impossible turnback" from 200 feet (which, in the typical low performance training glider, is about equal to turning back at 600 feet in a C172). We actually train for it for real - there's no other way to do it - the instructor will eventually pull the bung on you at around 200ft. It's an essential skill because power failures (rope or cable breaks) are a lot more frequent than engines quitting on a single. Doing it off a simulated winch launch failure is quite exciting - we tend to do that at about 400 ft though because it's an extremely critical manoevre, since you're pitched up at 50 degrees or so and any delay equals a low altitude stall. The ground looks really, really close when you pitch down steeply to quickly regain your airspeed and can see nothing but green in front of you. The really important bit about this training though is you're not taught it as an absolute. The mantra is to first do what it takes to maintain airspeed, then quickly decide on a course of action. The course of action could be any of several possibilities - can you get down on the remaining runway? Can you turn back? Is what's in front of you landable? Land to the side? Which way is the wind going? (If there's a crosswind aloft, this affects the decision on which way you're going to turn: you should have already decided turn direction in the 'eventualities' part of the checklist before the slack is even taken up on the cable or tow rope). The answer is as always training, and having a plan. Think of the eventualities just as you line up - if you lose power at point X, what should you do. At point Y, what should you do? What about point Z? -- From the sunny Isle of Man. Yes, the Reply-To email address is valid. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
lancair crash scapoose, OR | gatt | Piloting | 10 | October 26th 06 03:34 PM |
Lancair IV | Dico Reyers | Owning | 6 | October 19th 04 11:47 PM |
Lancair 320 ram air? | ROBIN FLY | Home Built | 17 | January 7th 04 11:54 PM |
Lancair 320/360 kit wanted!!! | Erik W | Owning | 0 | October 3rd 03 10:17 PM |
Lancair IVP | Peter Gottlieb | Home Built | 2 | August 22nd 03 03:51 AM |