![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I came across this technology on the web when I was researching the recent ADS-B nprm. Looks like there's already some portable/handheld ADS-B type equipment in use in Europe for the soaring community: http://www.rf-developments.com/shop/...d&productId=26 http://www.rf-developments.com/shop/...d&productId=33 All based on some SSA technology called FLARM: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FLARM Maybe this will be a low cost answer to spamcans being forced into the ADS-B regs. Hrm. These devices are all based on something called FLARM. FLARM works by detecting each aircraft's location via GPS and broadcasting it on a license-free radio frequency. There are 2 things about FLARM that make me uncomfortable: First, the information needed for third party manufactures to build FLARM compatible devices is not public. This means that Joe Bloggs Avionics Corp can't build their own FLARM device at a cheaper price. Instead you must buy from the FLARM company or another company that has licensed FLARM. Imagine if transponders were like this! There would be a government sactioned monopoly. I'm sure you can guess if the price of transponders would be higher or lower then at present. Secondly, as far as I know, all FLARMs are time-bombed. They stop working after a certain date. After that time, you have to upgrade the software to make it work again. Sure, this doesn't cost anything, but what if the FLARM company goes bankrupt? If you can't get software updates, your FLARM stops working!! Disclaimer: I've had some personal involvement with the FLARM that's left a bitter taste in my mouth. Back at university, I tried to make a FLARM compatible device as a project. FLARM marketing material said that the information to make third party devices compatible with FLARM would be provided on request, in the interest of safety - after all, the more aircraft fitted with anticollision systems the better. When I actually asked for this information I was told no, it was not public information after all. Sorry we changed our minds - you now have to buy a license for all the electronics. I think it's wrong to promote your product by saying it will be an open standard, then changing your mind when it starts to get adopted. I'm not saying that FLARM is a bad product; far from it. I've flown in FLARM equipped gliders and feelt much safer doing so. But please keep these points in mind. Cheers Al |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Gliders, transponders, and MOAs | Greg Arnold | Soaring | 2 | May 26th 06 05:13 PM |
Cessna forced down by the Feds | C J Campbell | Piloting | 51 | February 8th 05 01:29 PM |
U$ Says Prisoners Beaten With Hand-Held Radios, NOT Clock Radios! *snicker* | JStONGE123 | Military Aviation | 1 | May 11th 04 06:22 AM |
Transponders and Radios - USA | Ray Lovinggood | Soaring | 1 | February 27th 04 06:10 PM |
Transponders, Radios and other avionics procurement questions | Corky Scott | Home Built | 5 | July 2nd 03 11:27 PM |