![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
noel.wade wrote:
I flew years with 3 pounds of lead shot secured in a bag at the top of the vertical fin above the battery cover (removed the black foam to make more space). My local authority was ok with that and I never had a problem, but also never ground looped. Ramy The bottom line is that cantilevering that kind of weight on the top of the tail is just not something that the aircraft designers and engineers anticipated. The structure wasn't designed for it - so just because it has worked doesn't mean that it won't fail in the future, or that it works on all gliders. Disregarding structure, there are performance reasons to keep the mass concentrated down in the fuselage. The closer to the center of rotation that you place some mass, the less force it takes to put that mass into motion. Here's a thought-experiment: Imagine rolling the aircraft. Imagine looking at the airplane from behind as it executes a perfect aileron roll. If you put the weight down low in the tail-boom, the rest of the tail rotates *around* that mass and it doesn't have to travel very far or move very fast. If it was way out at the tip of the tail, it would move through a much bigger circle over the same time period. That means it travels farther and has to move faster. It takes energy to start and stop the movement of that mass. In short: Handling is going to be less crisp and it will be harder to make subtle attitude corrections with a bunch of mass out at the tip of the tail (or the tip of a wing, or any extreme end of the glider). Take care, --Noel But glider designers DO put the substantial mass of a battery at the tip of the tail. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|