![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 16, 12:46*pm, Brian wrote:
Take a glider at approach speed about 5 feet off the runway in steady state (at least for a glider) level flight with all drag devices retracted.. If you deploy the spoilers and do not change attitude the glider will drop onto runway, speed will change very little. if you deploy airbrakes the glider will slow and settle to the runway. If you deploy flaps the glider will balloon up. Maintaining a constant attitude in the test you describe will require a pitch control input and that input controls what happens to the glider as the devices are deployed. To put it another way, maintaining pitch attitude is an arbitrary choice. You could have specified constant sink rate, constant glide path, constant airspeed, etc etc. That close to the ground my intent is to control sink rate and the controls interact to achieve that. In my experience deploying my top surface devices with stick free results in nose down pitch, increased sink rate, and airspeed remains essentially constant. Who can define the name of the device that causes that? Andy |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Spoilers, no spoilers? | Amine | Piloting | 39 | February 14th 08 02:37 AM |
spoilers vs. ailerons | [email protected] | Piloting | 36 | August 8th 05 11:24 AM |
Airbrakes Pop Out at 115 kts | ContestID67 | Soaring | 13 | May 10th 05 01:50 PM |
ASW19b best descent rate on approach (full airbrakes) | Robert Sharpe | Soaring | 1 | April 30th 05 11:41 AM |
L-13 Spoilers | Scott | Soaring | 2 | August 27th 03 06:08 AM |