![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 18, 7:34*am, "Jay Honeck" wrote:
*I've only shot 54 instrument approaches under the hood, and have maybe fifty hours total simulated IMC, which pales into insignificance when compared with someone who flies instruments daily. PLEASE, PLEASE go out with an IA pilot and touch a cloud! It's the folks that don't actively touch a cloud that gets in the most trouble, not the ones that do it daily. You have the means to do this, so really there is no excuse for you.. I put this in my original post and will reiterate it, ias it is sooooo important! I have taken VFR pilots and IA students up and even been safety pilot with newly minted pilots who never touched a cloud DURING an approach. The hood, blinders what ever you wish to call it doesn't compare to the real deal. MSFS doesn't compare to the real deal. A couple of the pilots had NO clue what it was inside IMC, and came out of it whiter then the cloud. Not because of turbulence mind you, but the fact they did not know which way was up or down. For the instrument pilot where I was safety, he was behind his airplane, enough to on the edge of dangerous. Not from his flying skills, but not knowing in detail what the procedures are in the ATC system AND making it work for him. He was getting a little overwhelmed just getting to his first fix! What is failing to be recognized in this entire thread is the workload is upped exponentially on instrument approaches. It's not a matter of picking up an approach plate, launching into the white wild yonder and flying a set of needles. It's not just a matter of flying needles. It's a mental process that will wear you down if you are not on top of your game and part of that game is feeling intimately (not verbal / non instrmententation) what your plane is telling you. It takes a combination of trusting the instruments, but also your senses. If you blindly trust your instruments without consideration they may fail, you will be a statistic. If you "trust but verify your instruments" you will be here to share your experiences. Part of that verification BEGINS with the seat of your pants feeling. Out of 825+ flight hours I have flown, 59.4 were in IMC, so I would believe I am reasonably qualified to stress the importance of the above based on personal experience even though I am not an instructor. Mx BLANKET statement is dangerous at best, flat out wrong would be more like it. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
DC-3 parts to give away | Robert Little | Restoration | 2 | November 23rd 06 03:30 AM |
Who can give a checkout? | Mark S Conway | General Aviation | 2 | May 9th 05 12:15 AM |
Winch give-away | KP | Soaring | 6 | January 11th 05 08:04 PM |
Did you ever give up on an IR? | No Such User | Piloting | 24 | November 26th 03 02:45 PM |
FS 2004 give away | Ozzie M | Simulators | 0 | November 23rd 03 03:50 PM |