![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Surprisingly, a search for "instrument meteorological conditions" in Chapter
14 of the CFRs yields only 6 hits, most referring to training, the only definition being found in part 170.3 (below). A similar search for IMC yields only 2 hits, both in part 170.3. FAR Part 1 Definitions: IFR conditions means weather conditions below the minimum for flight under visual flight rules. FAR 170.3 Instrument flight rules (IFR) means rules governing the procedures for conducting flight under instrument meteorological conditions (IMC) instrument flight. Instrument meteorological conditions (IMC) means weather conditions below the minimums prescribed for flight under Visual Flight Rules (VFR). To that end, what purpose does this serve? It appears that the FAA has taken what was once a very easy to understand concept and the phrase that clearly defined it and fubared it beyond belief. If IMC is no longer "actual meteorological conditions requiring flight solely by reference to instruments", why use the acronym or the term? The next question this fubar brings to the table is what constitutes loggable actual instrument flight? From Assistant Chief counsel, John Cassidy - "Section 61.51(c)(4) provides rules for the logging of instrument flight time which may be used to meet the requirements of a certificate or rating, or to meet the recent flight experience requirements of Part 61. That section provides in part, that a pilot may log as instrument flight time only that time during which he or she operates the aircraft solely by reference to instruments, under actual (instrument meteorological conditions (imc)) or simulated instrument flight conditions. "Simulated" instrument conditions occur when the pilot's vision outside of the aircraft is intentionally restricted, such as by a hood or goggles. "Actual" instrument flight conditions occur when some outside conditions make it necessary for the pilot to use the aircraft instruments in order to maintain adequate control over the aircraft. Typically, these conditions involve adverse weather conditions." "Actual instrument conditions may occur on a moonless night over the ocean with no discernible horizon, if use of the instruments is necessary to maintain adequate control over the aircraft. The determination as to whether flight by reference to instruments is necessary is somewhat subjective and based in part on the sound judgment of the pilot. Note that, under Section 61.51(b)(3), the pilot must log the conditions of the flight. The log should include the reasons for determining that the flight was under actual instrument conditions in case the pilot later would be called on to prove that the actual instrument flight time logged was legitimate." To answer the OP, I simply fly the airplane. My normal mode of operation is to use both outside visual references and reference to the instruments. The degree to which I use either, depends upon the conditions at any given moment. Jim |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sandblasting reference? | Michael Horowitz | Home Built | 7 | November 20th 07 07:01 AM |
FAR Reference - Self Fueling | Ben Smith | Owning | 8 | April 8th 04 11:07 PM |
Engineering reference: | Richard Lamb | Home Built | 1 | March 14th 04 03:18 PM |
For General Reference | El Roto | Home Built | 0 | February 23rd 04 04:00 AM |
looking for modern F-4 reference | Rob van Riel | Military Aviation | 1 | November 13th 03 08:39 PM |