![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dudley Henriques wrote:
Any article that "discounts Bernoulli" as having anything to do with lift is incorrect. I just can't understand why there is so much trouble in the pilot community understanding that Newton and Bernoulli do NOT conflict in any way whatsoever, and that each explanation is correct in itself. Newton AND Bernoulli are BOTH present simultaneously on th wing at any moment lift is being created. EACH creates the other and EACH is a complete explanation for how lift is created. You can use either Newton or Bernoulli to explain lift, but the correct way to explain it is to explain how both are correct. In other words, anytime you have lift being created you have a Newton explanation AND a Bernoulli explanation occurring at the SAME TIME! Most people seem to want simple, one size fits all answers to everything and forget that most real life things, e.g. what causes lift and what causes cancer, are complex and can't be boiled down into a 10 second sound bite. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Apology re mxsmanic | terry | Piloting | 96 | February 16th 08 05:17 PM |
I saw Mxsmanic on TV | Clear Prop | Piloting | 8 | February 14th 07 01:18 AM |
Mxsmanic | gwengler | Piloting | 30 | January 11th 07 03:42 AM |
Getting rid of MXSMANIC | [email protected] | Piloting | 33 | December 8th 06 11:26 PM |
Feeling aircraft sensations | Ramapriya | Piloting | 17 | January 12th 06 10:15 AM |