A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

TANKER CONTROVERSY: QUESTIONS THE AIR FORCE MUST ANSWER



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #24  
Old May 28th 08, 11:12 PM posted to rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval,sci.military.naval
Steven P. McNicoll[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 721
Default TANKER CONTROVERSY: QUESTIONS THE AIR FORCE MUST ANSWER

KENG wrote:

One point. MacAir is now Boeing.


It wasn't Boeing when it successfully built the KC-10, an aircraft utilizing
a flying boom.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Boeing to File Protest of U.S. Air Force Tanker Contract Award Larry Dighera Piloting 3 March 12th 08 09:20 PM
Can you answer these questions? [email protected] Piloting 15 December 24th 04 04:29 AM
Answer on CEF ILS RWY 23 questions Paul Tomblin Instrument Flight Rules 21 October 17th 04 04:18 PM
Boeing contract with Navy could help with Air Force tanker deal Henry J Cobb Military Aviation 0 June 20th 04 10:32 PM
Naval Air Refueling Needs Deferred in Air Force Tanker Plan Henry J Cobb Military Aviation 47 May 22nd 04 03:36 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.