![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 11, 2:37*pm, wrote:
Andrew, Regarding specifically Experimental Exhibition and Racing certificated gliders that were certificated after July 19, 1993; Take a look at The Order 8130.2F, CHG 3, Paragraph 161. subparagraph (37) (page 178) regarding the annual program letter requirement. Looks to me like if you just do proficiency flying all summer and don't go to a "sanctioned meet", you might be OK with your original letter. Of course, per subparagraph (34) that pro flying takes place within a 300 mile radius of your home base airport. Subparagraph (35) is also interesting reading, but in any case, all the paragraphs have to be read together in detail ad nauseum to make any sense *- and then we realize we are reading FAA guidance, so making sense may not be the preferred task outcome. Don't forget your copy of the "highlighted aeronautical chart" that you carry with you aboard the aircraft per 161.(37). While paragraph 132 may appear to be in conflict with the above - we'll just go with the guidance specific to Exhibition and Racing certificates, and even more specific to Group 1: Performance Competition Aircraft, which iswhat the racing glider is defines as by the FAA.. Paragraph 155.(c) (page 166) states that when the aircraft's base of operation is changed or a change in ownership occurs, the owner must notify the local FSDO and provide a copy of the inspection program (if applicable, not likely for a glider, unless it's a turbine powered glider) and a copy of the requested proficiency flight area. Call your local FSDO for guidance specific to their area of operation. Some FSDO's and aircraft Ops Limitations differ because The Order allows it, see Paragraph 161, suparagraph a. (page 172) where it states "The FAA Inspector may impose any additional limitations deemed necessary in the interest of safety." Jim I'm speculating that if you do have a crash and the FAA determines that you are out of compliance on your LOA and hence your certificate of airworthiness that your insurance company may NOT cover your claims? That would be the most compeling reason to make sure you have the proper LOA filed with the FAA. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
De-registration | [email protected] | Soaring | 11 | August 24th 07 06:09 AM |
OLC Registration | [email protected] | Soaring | 7 | April 17th 07 04:10 PM |
Registration question | Michael Horowitz | Owning | 7 | January 25th 06 03:50 PM |
Canadian registration to US? | CFLav8r | Owning | 7 | March 15th 04 03:35 AM |
Aircraft registration ??? | Ludlow Johnson | Piloting | 13 | November 12th 03 06:53 PM |