![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 04 Jun 2008 10:53:26 -0700, PaPaPeng wrote:
This long thread is evidence that the Chinese are already messing up your minds from across the Pacific and in your own front yard (1.2%.) Do the South Asians (Indians), Russians, Europeans, Arabs, anyone else out there?, pose the same amount of concern about your place in the global scene? Nope. China has displaced the USSR as your enemy #1. It doesn't help that China has decided that we're their primary enemy too, and I can recall one speech by Chi Haotian that makes me rather nervous when I think of it. If you look at Chinese foreign policy for the last twenty five years or so, it strongly resembles a Weiqi game on a board designed by Halford MacKinder and Karl Hausehoffer. I've got to give them a great deal of credit though. We build weapons and hope that we can come up with the logistics to deploy and support them. The Chinese built the logistical structure first and deferred weapons acquisition until they could support it. We could learn something from that,... It's one of the big reasons that I hope that we don't attack Iran, (another SCO member) and that we get out of the Middle East. If you ask que bono, the only winner regardless of what we do or how well, will be Beijing. In the end, I hope we stay out of a direct armed conflict in any case. We're a post industrial technological power with a rapidly declining industrial base while China is a rising industrial power and the preeminent industrial power on the planet-- what we were in WW-II. Given our lack of convertable industrial base and our tendency to buy boutique weapons systems that are too precious to hazard and impossible to replace in wartime, all China has to do in order to win is simply not lose. I'd just as soon avoid two things. First a modern equivalent of the Russo-Japanese War with us playing the Czar's part, and a situation where we both work to exhaust each other like the Persians and the Byzantines, since in the end, your Islamic proxies would come to devour us both. (Which may be their intention. They study history too.) -- "Implications leading to ramifications leading to shenanigans"-- Admiral Elmo Zumwalt, USN. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Target Iran: US able to strike in the spring | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 22 | February 23rd 07 05:24 AM |
Bush Iran War Plans - 4 Strike Groups in the Persian Gulf | Airyx | Naval Aviation | 13 | November 1st 06 01:08 AM |
Bush Iran War Plans - 4 Strike Groups in the Persian Gulf | Mike Weeks | Naval Aviation | 0 | October 26th 06 07:09 PM |
Bush Iran War Plans - 4 Strike Groups in the Persian Gulf | Ragnar | Naval Aviation | 0 | October 25th 06 09:23 PM |