![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 15, 1:30 pm, wrote:
On Jun 9, 12:36 pm, Le Chaud Lapin wrote: On Jun 9, 1:19 pm, Gig 601Xl Builder You never learned of trim until MSFS and you are going to design an airplane. Fabulous! Is it really necessary to understand the particular way it was done in C172 to achieve the same result? The same thing could be achieved using more electronics, less mechanics, and the controls might be entirely different. #1. Learn to fly first. #2. Study the construction of aircraft, best done by taking an aircraft maintenance course. #3. THEN think about designing an airplane. No worthwhile design that I'm aware of has ever been put forward by someone who was unfamiliar with the way things are now and why they are that way, but I have seen designs built by folks who "knew better" than everyone else. One of those, built by a local guy who would take no constructive criticism of his ideas, stalled at circuit altitude and dropped him, hard, on the surface of the earth. He was such a stubborn guy that he got up and walked away, but he neither built nor flew any more airplanes. Needless to say, this design was neither inspected nor approved nor licensed to any standard whatever. Adding electronic controls to something like a trim tab on a lightplane is one of those "better" ideas that has no basis in reality. It adds complexity, which adds failure points and cost and weight, none of which are welcome. It is no more accurate than manual trim. Dan I concur with Dan on his last two posts, yeah that's rare, but anyway... I designed and tested (models) of a fantastic plane, but when I chose between putting my wife and kids in my fantastic plane or into a proven (safe) C172, I chose the C172. Here's why: If my machine cracked up due to a fault in my design, and killed my family except for me, I'd feel obligated to shoot myself, though I wouldn't. That said, build your machine, put it threw it's paces then take on a passenger, who knows what the tag "EXPERMENTAL" means on the side of the A/C, and have fun. Ken |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
F-100 detail | Pjmac35 | Aviation Photos | 0 | July 26th 07 10:29 AM |
Finding "Neutral" Position on Piper Elevator/Trim Tab | [email protected] | Owning | 10 | December 7th 06 01:43 PM |
Detail pops in too late in FS2004 | CatharticF1 | Simulators | 0 | August 27th 03 03:25 AM |