![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 19, 1:44 pm, wrote:
On Jun 19, 2:32 pm, "Ken S. Tucker" wrote: True actuator #1 can fail, then actuator #2 still works, then actuator #1 is replaced. Asking the question about the F-16, "fly-by- wire" fighter, dated 1972, do we have failures due to the electonics and servos? Ken Don't ask me. Ask the USAF about the failure rate and resultant bailouts and aircraft losses when they quit. Ask them how many maintenance hours are spent on each airplane for each hour of flight. And then compare that with the maintenance the average privately-owned lightplane gets. Dan I'm a brat who did "points" on old ICE's, adjusted carbs...then along comes electronic ignition and fuel injection and my car starts easily at -20F. So these advances are definitely reducing my maintenance. Wife just bought a Gran Caravan that's scary with electronics, (she loves it), but I'm keeping a real close eye on all them gizmo's, so far...excellent...after nearly 2 years. Ken |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
F-100 detail | Pjmac35 | Aviation Photos | 0 | July 26th 07 10:29 AM |
Finding "Neutral" Position on Piper Elevator/Trim Tab | [email protected] | Owning | 10 | December 7th 06 01:43 PM |
Detail pops in too late in FS2004 | CatharticF1 | Simulators | 0 | August 27th 03 03:25 AM |