![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Le Chaud Lapin wrote:
I must ask then, if one were to look at a typical GA aircraft, in the year 2100, in your opinion, will it be as devoid of electro-mechanical controls as it is today? What will it look like? -Le Chaud Lapin- In less than 100 years we went from the first plane the Wrights built to the Space Shuttle, the F22 and more importantly for this conversation the Cirrus SR-22. For over half of that century we've told out kids through magazines like "Popular Science" that flying cars are about 10 years away. I personally think you have bought into the "Popular Science" mindset and if you aren't a 15 year old kid (which I'm not really sure that you aren't) you will probably grow out of it. Will there be electro-mechanical controls in future GA aircraft? Of course there will be. The 601XL I'm building has electro-mechanical in it running the elevator and aileron trim. Will the entire wire or push-rod system be replaced? If the parts get to the point where they are of equal or less weight AND the system is as reliable AND cost is equal or less than what is used now the answer is yes. If the Wright brothers were to come back to life today they could look at the SR-22 or the other aircraft I mentioned and understand why they fly how they do. They could probably fly the Cirrus with no more check out than is required of the average guy who is transitioning from a 172. There is a reason for this. Airplanes work the way they do because they are flying in the same environment they were in 1903. They have to overcome the same gravity and they need to be as light as possible for a given job. You have all these grand ideas that replacing everything with electronics will make aircraft easier to fly and cheaper. Yet you have never really told us your idea. You just keep saying things like, "Well, my design will get around that problem." I know you think that there is all this open source software and electronic hardware that is available and cheap. And you have been raised to think that there is not problem that a few silicon chips can't fix. BUT I can pretty much assure you that there are a lot of people a lot smarter than you in the world and some of them work for companies called Lockheed and Boeing and even Cessna and Cirrus. Tell me this. If it could be done cheaper why aren't any of these companies doing it? It isn't like they are making all the money they want and I'm sure any of them would be more than happy to increase the size of the market for aircraft by 1000 fold. I want the flying car I've been promised by "Popular Science" and so do a lot of other people and Boeing and Cessna and Cirrus and the other know it. They just don't know how to make it because with technology available today it can't be made. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FA: 1-Day-Left: 3 Advanced AVIATION Books: Aviation Electronics, Air Transportation, Aircraft Control and Simulation | Mel[_2_] | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | September 8th 07 01:37 PM |
FA: 3 Advanced AVIATION Books: Aviation Electronics, Air Transportation, Aircraft Control and Simulation | Derek | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | September 3rd 07 02:17 AM |
FA: 1-Day-Left: 3 AVIATION Books: Aviation Electronics, Air Transportation, Aircraft Control and Simulation | Jeff[_5_] | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | September 1st 07 12:45 PM |
FA: 3 AVIATION Books: Aviation Electronics, Air Transportation, Aircraft Control and Simulation | Jon[_4_] | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | August 24th 07 01:13 AM |
FA: 3 ADVANCED AVIATION Books: Aviation Electronics, Air Transportation, Aircraft Control and Simulation | Larry[_3_] | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | August 6th 07 02:23 AM |