![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 07:33:47 -0700 (PDT), Harry K
wrote: One of the big problems is teh pit stop plus short flying time. Even if they get it down to 15 minutes, they have each plane on the ground for as long, or longer, than they ar flying. I can see the announcers hyping the pit stops..."looks like Jim Campbell is going to set a new course record folks, he is almost ready to leave the pits in under.... 13.56!!" With two planes going head to head in the exhibition it will be 15 minutes flying and 15 minutes for the crowd to make their own pit stops for muchies and p calls. If that is the way it goes, I will bet the at least half the crowd will find something better to do after the first pit. Actually, I got email the other day that says the RRL will be able to better the 15 minutes I'd previously guessed. If what I hear is right, I figure five minutes might be doable. However, since the planes can't taxi under their own power, that time has to include towing them back to the takeoff point. Traffic control might be an issue. The planes are practically identical in design. If they take off at about the same time, they are likely to run out of fuel at about the same time, too. How about four planes maneuvering for simultaneous deadstick landings? The only solution is to stagger the takeoffs by several minutes, to ensure there are planes that keep flying when others pit and the conflicts for runway space don't happen. But then you've lost the head-to-head racing aspect...a Rocket Racer with half its fuel burned will out-accelerate a plane that still has most of its takeoff load. You get lots of fast passes, but not the breathtaking duels of unlimited racing. I think the question you have to ask yourself is, "Will people find the *style* of racing interesting if they were prop-powered planes, instead?" The short flights, the relatively high flying, the long powerless glides, the "virtual" course that a spectator has to watch a video monitor to see, etc. If the answer is "no," then rocket racing will be successful until the novelty of seeing rocket planes glide around wears off. Ron Wanttaja |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rocket Racing League First Exhibition Race August 1st and August 2nd, 2008 | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 15 | July 3rd 08 07:56 AM |
$300,000 Flight Competition August 2-10, 2008 | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 0 | January 3rd 08 11:31 AM |
Rocket Racing League/Zzzz | Kyle Boatright | Home Built | 4 | May 7th 07 04:17 AM |
Rocket racing at Reno | raptor | Home Built | 2 | November 3rd 05 02:48 AM |
Rocket Racing League | John Ousterhout | Home Built | 34 | October 7th 05 06:30 AM |