![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Chad Irby
writes In article , "Paul J. Adam" wrote: Actually, the Hog does, if it knows what direction the other guy is coming from. First, you're addressing a more "average" scenario than the one I was talking about (no missiles for the F-15, A-10 ready for the incoming threat). Pretty extreme, then... That's an extremely large "if", given the extensive air-to-air sensor suite fitted to the A-10... It's called a "radar warning receiver," and it tells you which direction you're being radiated from. If the other guy isn't using radar, they're proabably not going to see you in the weeds at all from any rational distance. Are there no AWACS? And does nobody use eyeball-shooter tactics? I can easily construct highly scenarios where enemy tanks down attaking Warthogs with accurately-thrown dinnerware, but that doesn't make cutlery into a generally useful anti-aircraft munition... Are you keeping your ordnance for this turn? How long does it take to get the nose pointed at the target while still having time to get that shot off? (driving your required detection range). Lots of time, in the case I was originally talking about (F-15s on the way back from an air-to-air sortie going after an opportune A-10 target). If you allow missiles for the F-15s and no cover for the A-10, it's a turkey shoot. But we were talking about gun tactics... I'm reminded of some of Jeff Cooper's rules. I'm also considering that if you're engaging A-10s, you'd do so to maximise your strengths and their weaknesses; which among other things means staying off their nose. How much airspeed do you have left at the end of it, which has a serious effect on your ability to escape the wingman? Not as such, since the only reason you need a lot of energy going into this sort of fight is to match someone else with a similar weapon. If you're up against someone who can blow you out of the sky from a mile or so further out than your weapon can reach, and who can fly below treetop level for a good part of the engagement, it's a whole different ballgame. And what happens when you discover the attacking aircraft was firing a missile, rather than making a gun pass? Not in this scenario. Sorry you came in late. If this analysis was accurate, the F-15 and F-22 would be screaming for 27mm or 30mm guns... ...or more bullets. What's the point of more ammunition, if you can't get into range to use what you already have? It's a very narrow scenario, and in this case, the A-10 isn't the helpless target you seem to want it to be. You misspelled "is", against any sort of capable air opposition. Fortunately, the A-10 has always operated under air supremacy and there's no sign of that changing soon. -- When you have to kill a man, it costs nothing to be polite. W S Churchill Paul J. Adam MainBoxatjrwlynch[dot]demon{dot}co(.)uk |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AIM-54 Phoenix missile | Sujay Vijayendra | Military Aviation | 89 | November 3rd 03 09:47 PM |
P-39's, zeros, etc. | old hoodoo | Military Aviation | 12 | July 23rd 03 05:48 AM |