![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 19, 6:55 am, Mike Spera wrote:
High time airplane owners will tell you it is a non issue. Low time owners will tell you to avoid high time airframes like the plague. And mechanics who work on higher-time light aircraft, like me, will tell you that all designs have their weak points that need checking, and that many mechanics either don't know those weak points or don't care. High-time airplanes that did nothing but long cross- countries won't be likely to have the fatigue problems that we find in trainers, but at the same time, the owners of those cross-country 172s might be doing things that break stuff, like pushing down on the stab to maneuver the airplane on the ground (breaking the forward stab spar) or using grass or gravel runways that cause a lot of fuselage flexing while taxiing over rougher ground (cracking the doorposts in a spot that is very hard to see and unlikely to get looked at). Cessna has a number of SEBs on such items, as well as the Continuing Airworthiness Program stuff that cover more of these issues. The Cessna R182 (182RG) has its problems, too, such as cracking gear actuators ($8000 for a new casting) and aft fuselage bulkhead cracks. Just because no 172s have come apart in flight (that I know of) doesn't mean that they'll not start doing so. Sooner or later one will, and I wouldn't want to be one of the people in it. Many owners think they're getting good maintenance (because their shop tells them so) and when we look at one of those airplanes we find the usual cracks. And cracked or broken exhaust components, which will either poison you or set fire to the airplane; take your pick. And many other things, too. If these cracks are caught by your mechanic, they won't kill you but they'll kill your bank account. If we have a choice between a "well-maintained" (yeah, right) older high-timer and one that has sat for years, I'll take the sitter as long as it doesn't have corrosion issues (humidity, salt air, or non-human residents). Both airplanes will need new engines and interiors and other plastic and rubber bits replaced. The high-timer will need structural repairs, maybe a lot of them. They're not cheap. By the time you're done you could have far more tied up in the airplane than it would ever be worth in resale value. Dan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
High time Bo A36 anyone? | Matt Whiting | Owning | 9 | February 8th 08 10:45 PM |
High time homebuilts | alice | Home Built | 2 | February 17th 07 07:06 AM |
typical total time and PIC time question | AJW | Piloting | 12 | October 15th 04 03:52 AM |
First Time Buyer - High Time Turbo Arrow | [email protected] | Owning | 21 | July 6th 04 07:30 PM |
152 with high time lycoming | Dave | Owning | 1 | June 27th 04 06:20 AM |