![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 20, 2:22*am, ContestID67 wrote:
I agree that this is "out of the box" thinking... Don Lancaster has written that ideas are not a dime a dozen--rather more like a dime a bale in hundred-bale lots. As for structural uses of polycarbonate, that can be made to work fine just so long as you understand the fundamental difference between strength and stiffness. The general rule of thumb for PV solar cells is that you can expect 1KW/m^2 of area, but only if the sun is high (less atmosphere to penetrate) and the cells are oriented normal to the sun. So the exposed area of a typical 15m ship of S=10m^2 might yield 10KW (just over 13 horsepower) under once-in-a-turn conditions, and maybe average 40% of that, around 5 horsepower, over a sunlit day. I can see that working for a highly-optimized single-seater. Heck, I've been to the ESA Western Workshop enough times to actually see it work for a specific highly-optimized single-seater. But for a less finely- optimized 2-seater, probably not so much. BTW and somewhat off-topic, in the latest update of his Energy Fundamentals paper, Lancaster suggests that PV solar might actually not be a net energy sink, and proposes a figure of $1/installed watt as the break-even threshold. Heck, that might even be doable. Thanks, Bob K. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|